Quarter 2 (Progress Report Year 2 Jan- March 2000)
Introduction
Western Kentucky University was awarded a grant by the Environmental Protection Agency (#X826659-01-0) to establish a small public water system Technical Assistance Center (the Center). This program seeks to focus our resources and expertise toward assisting small water deliverers in achieving and maintaining capacity development. The capacity development framework offers a forum within which this Center is working with state regulatory agencies and small water systems to assist them in acquiring and maintaining technical, financial and managerial capacity needed to provide safe drinking water and achieve the public health protection goals of the EPA Safe Drinking Water Act.
Western Kentucky University has developed this Center with long range goals, and a “regional” focus. The work plan for this Center is organized into tasks that have multi-year projects all aimed at completion during a five-year program. These tasks are distinct in nature, but mutually supportive. Task 1 addresses training in managerial and financial capacity development; Task 2 provides technical capacity development in a “circuit rider” approach; Task 3 conducts field studies in 17 different watersheds in Kentucky, and analyzes methods of source water protection; Task 4 establishes a data base management system to receive, organize, integrate and distribute project information; and Task 5 establishes a forum to identify and help evaluate innovative and alternative technology applications that can assist small system operators in the delivery of safe drinking water to their customers. In addition, Task 5 seeks to become a Field Testing Organization (FTO) in the EPA's Environmental Testing Validation (ETV) Program, and is currently exploring a cooperative effort with Montana State University to establish a biological denitrification pilot project in Bowling Green, KY.
Executive Summary
Introduction. Western Kentucky University has established a Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality for small public water systems. Information presented in this report represents efforts during the second quarter of year two of this grant. Year one of this grant covered the 15-month period, 1 July 1998 - 30 September 1999. Grant execution and periods of performance are now aligned with the Environmental Protection Agency fiscal year.
Synopsis. This second quarter, second contract year report depicts progress in each of the aforementioned task areas. The activities of the Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality during this quarter have been a continuation of the data collection and baselines established in the previous quarters in developing and delivering management training courses; conducting on-site technical assistance; selecting, initial sampling, and evaluation of sites used for sources of drinking water; and identifying innovative methodologies that can provide help to small systems operators.
Task 1. The introductory course in Utility Management has been developed and tested on three occasions during the last contract year and first quarter of this contract year. This 3-day course will be offered as a Kentucky Rural Water Association Management Course in April 2000, and again in June 2000. Sixty managers will be trained in year 2000. Widespread acceptance of this initial course offering was received by small utility water managers from across the state.
Task 2. The Circuit Rider Program provided on-site, hands on technical assistance in 93 visits to small community and non-community systems this quarter. Assistance ranged from water audits and leak detection to wellhead protection and contaminant inventories.
Task 3. Sampling schedules under wet conditions were stalled in the first quarter due to the severe drought that Kentucky has experienced for the final 6 months of 1999. Dry characterization samples for all karst sites were collected to establish the baselines, and wet characterization samples have been collected and analyzed in this quarter in year 2000. The source of atrazine contamination in the Marion, KY watershed is being discussed among WKU, USGS, KRWA, and KY Division of Water. Round two sampling and analysis may shed more light on the situation. The synoptic portion of our sampling program was begun in order to characterize the watersheds for BMP development. Water sampling has begun in the 10 non-karst sites where trihalomethanes (THM) are considered a problem. Data collected in the THM study will be used to develop mathematical models that are aimed at lowering the treatment costs in providing safe water.
Task 4. Efforts by Task 4 this quarter were focused in five areas: (1) ongoing website development as a tool for providing information to water systems; (2) development of software and information tools for the direct use of water providers themselves; (3) beginning to expand our information services to those states in EPA Region 4 beyond Kentucky; (4) ongoing construction and maintenance of the project database; and (5) reconstruction and refurbishing of donated, retired computers for use by water systems in need. A major renovation of the project's website has been undertaken. Completion is near of a computer software program for the use of small water systems in filing their Monthly Operating Reports, MOR Advisor. We have begun expansion of our data gathering and information services to the other states in EPA Region 4. Development of the project database is continuing. Finally, significant progress has been made in the rehabilitation of donated older computers for free distribution to small water systems.
Task 5. This quarter's work continued efforts with two major innovative technologies: an Actiflo ultrafiltration system that is currently undergoing field tests, and a GIS mapping program employing a modified version of ArcView that has been customized for small water systems by Spatial Data Integrations, Inc. Achieving certification as a Field Testing Organization is also being pursued.
Administration
Costs invoiced during the second quarter, second year represent salary and fringe benefits for the Director. Costs also represent the efforts of administrative personnel and activities necessary to organize efforts in and among all five tasks, develop a cost accounting system and track accounts. Administrative responsibilities further included interaction with officials in the Kentucky Division of Water, the Kentucky Infrastructure Authority and the Kentucky Rural Water Association to assure that task activity was in accordance with the water quality objectives of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The Director also met with and gave guidance to the Task Managers in order that our activities were in accordance with the grant technical proposal and milestone schedules.
In March 2000, the Director and Dr. Chris Groves (Task 3) met with the Kentucky Department of Agriculture, Division of Pesticides; the Kentucky Division of Water; the Kentucky Rural Water Association; and the U.S. Geological Survey to further evaluate the atrazine issue in Marion, Ky. Concentrations exceeded the MCL at several times during the summer and fall of 1999. Efforts are continuing to establish WKU and the Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality as a Field Testing Organization (FTO) under the Environmental Technology Validation (ETV) Program. A biological denitrification project was among those technologies we pursued to pilot in this quarter without success. Kentucky has few nitrate problems in drinking water and nitrate spiking was not viewed acceptable to the ETV program. We will continue exploring pilot projects for technologies that can help the operation of small water companies.
The Technical Assistance Center has acquired and modified approximately 24 386/486 personal computers (PCs) that were donated by departments within Western Kentucky University. The modification and cannibalization of these computers generated nine functional computers retrofitted with software packages that will provide small water systems with word processing and spreadsheet capabilities. We have also installed on these machines software developed by Dr. Ouida Meier and Mr. Seth Johnson of the Database Management Team that will give water systems the capability to easily generate monthly water loss reports, monthly operating reports, and annual consumer confidence reports. Internet connection capacity will also be provided. These PCs will be provided at no cost to systems based upon specific selection criteria. Technical assistance will also be provided in setting up and operating the computers. It is anticipated that these computers will be distributed to small water systems in May 2000.
B. Expenditures:
Total administrative expenditures from 10/01/00 to 03/31/00 are $31,613.14. Administrative expenditures borne by the grant in the second quarter of the second year totaled $2,321.09 from the year 1 budget, and $10,608.15 from the year 2 budget. WKU has contributed $53,974.25 in the second quarter, second year (10/01/99 - 03/31/00) of the Water Quality project for all tasks combined. The budget status of all tasks is depicted in Appendix A.
Task 1: Utility Management Institute (UMI)
I. Work Status
The goal of the UMI is to develop and deliver a series of courses to be included in a “Utility Management Professional” certification program available to system managers, operators, and office managers of water systems serving rural areas and small municipalities with populations under 10,000.
A. Work Progress.
The bulk of activity related to the Utility Management Institute (UMI) during this quarter was spent in researching and developing the second year’s courses with the assistance of Western Kentucky University’s (WKU) Center for Math, Science, and Environmental Education. The introductory course has been developed and consists of three days of classroom activity concentrating on subjects such as the history of drinking water, drinking water regulation, financial management, personnel management, and customer relations. An outline of Utility Management 101 is attached. The three specific subject courses will be covering areas of Utility Finance, Organization, Regulation & Law, and Human Resource Management.
The Utility Management Institute, as part of the WKU Technology Assistance Center, will be offered in conjunction with the Kentucky Rural Water Association’s Management Conference in Bowling Green, KY on April 11-13, 2000. A second offering of the introductory course will be presented on June 20-22 in Lexington, Kentucky. These two opportunities will allow 60 individuals to complete the introductory course during 2000.
B. Difficulties Encountered.
No unanticipated difficulties were encountered.
C. Preliminary Data Results.
Data and information generated by activities in Task 1 are incorporated into the Utilities Management course outlined.
D. Anticipated Activities.
The introductory course will be offered twice during the year and the next three courses will continue in their development stage with the participation of the WKU Center for Math, Science, and Environmental Education.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for this task from 10/01/99 to 03/31/00 were $56,337.59. Expenditures during the second quarter of the second year totaled $47.37 from the year 1 budget, and $24,203.85 from the year 2 budget.
III. Key Personnel Changes
There were no personnel changes during the second quarter of the second year for Task 1.
Task 2: Circuit Rider Program
I. Work Status
The "Circuit Rider" approach to providing a combination of on-site technical assistance and training is nationally recognized as the most effective method of assisting small public water systems to comply with state and federal environmental regulations. The Circuit Rider program works in partnership with Kentucky Division of Water (DOW) to target the public water systems serving populations under 3,300, with particular emphasis on systems serving less than 500 people, that are experiencing profound difficulties in complying with SDWA provisions.
A. Work Progress.
During the quarter the Circuit Rider made 93 technical assistance visits to non-community and community water systems for a total of 608.75 program hours. Three of the on-site visits were spent conducting water audits, while four visits involved leak detection. The Circuit Rider assisted with five public meetings on wellhead protection efforts, and three contaminant source inventories were completed. The Circuit Rider also taught six hours of water-related mathematics to participants at a KRWA sponsored training session. In addition, 21 on-site visits were made concerning assistance with the Consumer Confidence Report.
During the quarter, the Circuit Rider has identified six small systems that are in need of computers for some aspect of their operations, either in the administrative office or in the treatment plant. These systems have completed applications explaining their need and await the availability of the machines.
B. Difficulties Encountered.
No unanticipated difficulties were encountered.
C. Preliminary Data Results.
See Work Progress above.
D. Anticipated Activities.
During the next quarter, the WKU Small System Circuit Rider will continue to assist systems with Consumer Confidence reporting and other regulatory issues. An increasing amount of the Circuit Rider’s time is expected to be spent with systems that have made specific requests for assistance through the KRWA office. Many of these requests have resulted from on-site visits. The Circuit Rider will also continue to identify systems that have computer needs in anticipation of future availability.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for this task from 10/01/99 to 03/31/00 are $32,044.05. Expenditures during the second quarter of the second year totaled $0 from the year 1 budget, and $21,049.56 from the year 2 budget.
III. Key Personnel Changes
There were no personnel changes for Task 2.
Task 3: Source Water Protection Initiative
I. Work Status
A. Work Progress.
Work on the Source Water Protection Initiative’s (Task 3) two major projects, the Best Management Practices Study and the Trihalomethane Study, each achieved scheduled progress.
Best Management Practices Study
The Best Management Practices Study encompasses three programs to characterize each study site’s source-water catchments: 1) water sampling and water analysis, 2) Geographic Information System (GIS) land use analysis, and 3) the examination of macroinvertebrates indicative of water quality. Progress for the three programs are outlined below:
Water Sampling: Regular monthly sampling for each of the seven sites began in January and continued through the quarter on a 28-day schedule. Samples were collected over a three-day period each week (Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday). A two person sampling team was mobilized to assist with sample collection at each site.
During the January sampling event, all of the study sites were in drought conditions, and it was decided to delay the collection of the wet characterization sample, which contained a comprehensive list of analytes. In January, freezing temperatures were encountered during the sampling, but collection was overall successful. During the cold, pumping equipment at the Logsdon and Hawkins wells (sampling locations for the Logsdon and Diamond Caverns study sites respectively) became frozen and samples could not be collected the day scheduled. Samples from these locations were collected two days later by a team who entered the cave and collected the samples by directly filling the sample containers from the underground stream. Because of the continually freezing surface temperatures (with no groundwater recharge) during the two day period, chemical and hydrological changes on the sampled groundwater were insignificant during this period. Thus, although the samples were taken two days after the scheduled day, the data are statistically appropriate to use in our trend analyses.
With the drought’s end in early February due to significant rains, a “wet characterization” round was conducted during the February sampling period. Unlike the dry characterization sampling in September of 1999, the normal monthly parameters were also being analyzed for the wet characterization. Samples were collected two days following a large storm event. Water levels at all sites were higher than observed in the past field work and turbidity had increased. Sample collection primarily went without major incident. Again, equipment problems at the wells caused sampling collection problems, but a contingency plan allowed the samples to be collected and delivered to the analytical labs on time.
Prior to the March sampling, each of the study catchments received rain. Normal monthly sampling was scheduled for March. Water levels at the sites were high again and similar to a month earlier. Turbidity was also high. Sample was conducted successfully. However, a problem developed at the Logsdon and Hawkins well sites when the air compressor failed to start. Sample collection was delayed for several hours until the equipment could be started. The water samples were collected on the scheduled day and delivered to the analytical labs on time.
Geographic Information Systems Development and Land use Analysis:
Geographic Information Systems spatial database development and land use analysis in the seven watersheds continued during this quarter. Through aerial infrared photography interpretation techniques, U.S. Geological Survey Anderson Level III land use and land cover analysis in four of the sites was completed. This quarter, Level III analysis in the drainage basins of Caneyville and Auburn were concluded. These land use parcels have been incorporated into our main GIS database.
Caneyville’s drainage basin is approximately 5.79 square miles, with 345 Level III land use parcels. Auburn’s basin is approximately 10.21 square miles, with 521 Level III land use parcels. We also have classified areas on the margins of the boundary lines, as these basin areas are estimates.
Anderson Level I creates broad categories of land use and land cover, into which Levels II and III are divided with increasing specificity. Level I categories classified in the Caneyville and Auburn basins (including boundary zones) are showing in Table 1.
Table 1. Anderson Level I Land use for Auburn and Caneyville Study Sites
Level I
Caneyville Area
Auburn Area
Caneyville and Auburn Totals
Urban and built up
0.14 mi2
1.02 mi2
1.16 mi2
Agricultural
3.18 mi2
9.18 mi2
12.36 mi2
Rangeland
0.01 mi2
0.06 mi2
0.07 mi2
Forestland
3.16 mi2
1.81 mi2
4.97 mi2
Water
0.14 mi2
0.09 mi2
0.23 mi2
Caneyville and Auburn Totals
6.63 mi2
12.16 mi2
18.79 mi2
Using Stream Macroinvertebrates as Indicators of Water Quality (Dr. Scott Grubbs)
The objectives of this study were two-fold: 1) first, continue work on creating a protocol for (a) an assessment of stream habitat, (b) collection and laboratory processing of macroinvertebrate samples, and (c) an assessment of stream health using measurements of stream habitat and macroinvertebrate structure and function. A working draft of the protocol, focusing on sampling and analysis techniques for surface water habitats, is completed. This protocol will undergo a series of revisions as macroinvertebrate sampling is conducted from each locality. Local conditions (i.e., meso-habitat availability, season, physical nature of stream bed) dictate the need for specializing a protocol to fit the biological and physical nature of the local and/or regional stream structure. A "virtual" protocol as an HTML and/or PDF document (as described above) is nearing completion with the aid of Mr. Brian Rix (WKU undergraduate student). This document has been reviewed and alterations will be made following testing of all collecting and analysis methods during the third quarter 2000; 2) second, to begin a first round of habitat and macroinvertebrate analyses of no less than five karst sites and no less than two non-karst sites throughout western Kentucky. Macroinvertebrate sampling has been conducted from the following localities (Table 2):
Table 2. Macroinvertebrate Sampling Summary
SAMPLING LOCALITY
DATE SAMPLED
SPECIFIC LOCALITY
HABITATS
SAMPLED
SAMPLES
ANALYZED
Auburn
26 Feb. 2000
Small stream immediately below "Blue Hole Spring"
(= water intake)
Riffle
Depositional
Incomplete
Guthrie
26 Feb. 2000
Small stream immediately below artificial impoundment
(= water intake)
Riffle
Depositional
Wood
Incomplete
Cadiz
05 Mar. 2000
Small stream immediately below concrete cistern
(= water intake)
Riffle
Depositional
Wood
Incomplete
Marion
05 Mar. 2000
Outlet of upper lake
(= Lake George)
Riffle
Incomplete
Preliminary Data Results:
Completed evaluations are not available in the second quarter concerning habitat analyses or macroinvertebrate assessment. As indicated previously, macroinvertebrate samples from four sites have been obtained and are in the process of being assessed.
Anticipated Activities:
Sampling dates for fiscal year two were selected during summer 1999 according to predicted periods of surface water flow. Two rounds of sampling have been scheduled to include both early/mid-February and early/mid-April. Due to the aforementioned drought in Kentucky, the sampling dates have been modified: round one: late February to late March; round two: May/June. Round one of sampling has been completed for Auburn, Guthrie, Cadiz, and Marion. Round one of sampling will soon be completed for Caneyville as well. Round two of sampling and habitat analyses needs to be completed for all sites by the middle of July. By the end of the third quarter of Fiscal Year 1999-2000, it is anticipated that macroinvertebrates from all sites will be identified. These data will be used to construct a preliminary site characterization describing both habitat structure and macroinvertebrate community structure. Prior to any anticipated remediation event or BMP implementation, the macroinvertebrate and habitat assessments will serve as baseline data.
Trihalomethane Project (Dr. Jeffrey Jack, University of Louisville)
The basin wide stream sampling program for the fall/winter of 1999/2000 has been completed. GIS coverages with metadata were generated for the stream sites. The metafiles are not complete as of March 31, 2000. The GIS files will be forwarded to the data manager (Task 4) as soon as the metadata is complete. We have also completed the laboratory analysis for the water chemistry parameters from these streams (Appendix B-1). The water chemistry data parameters collected were used to physiochemically characterize the streams we sampled. The production of THMs is most closely linked to DOC levels, but DOC can be indirectly affected by nutrient conditions in the streams (via limits on primary production, etc.) These data were used to establish baselines in the streams.
We conducted a second multi-watershed survey assessing THM levels in the Ohio River and its major tributaries in Kentucky and Indiana, all of which serve as drinking water supplies. The Ogden Water Quality Laboratory is still analyzing the THM data from this survey. The Environmental Analysis Laboratory in Louisville is analyzing water quality parameters at the University of Louisville.
We have continued monthly sampling protocol at one reservoir in the Salt River watershed, Taylorsville Lake. We sampled the lake at its inflow and outflow and also at two depths, epilimnetic and hypolimnetic, in the lake proper. We have reduced sampling to three points in the reservoir after stratification broke down in November. We expect to increase sampling to multiple points in the reservoir in April of this year, concomitant with stratification. Data from this survey are included in Appendix B-2. The chemistry parameters measured were the ones most closely associated with THM production. These data will be used in the construction and testing of the THM model.
Other Activities
Marion Atrazine Work Group: Members of the Task 3 Best Management Practices Study met with the Kentucky Department of Agriculture, Division of Pesticides, Division of Water (representatives from both Groundwater and Drinking Water Branches), the Kentucky Rural Water Association, and the USGS in Frankfort, Kentucky on March 30, 2000. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss and coordinate strategies for remediating the persistent Atrazine contamination at the Marion, Kentucky field site. Data was exchanged between the various agencies, and possible causes of this contamination were discussed. An informal presentation by the USGS showed that annual yields of atrazine (measured as grams/acre over an entire watershed) were as much as two orders of magnitude higher in portions of the Ohio River Basin (including all of Kentucky, Northern Tennessee, Southern Illinois, Southern Indiana, and Southern Ohio) than they were anywhere else in the country. There was a general consensus among those who attended the meeting that the situation in Marion may be much more complex than was originally suspected. Some possible sources of atrazine contamination that were suggested were illegal disposal of chemicals and/or containers, adsorption and subsequent desorption from sediments in the field, and groundwater contamination. This discussion was largely academic, however, and until the actual source(s) of the atrazine contamination are pinpointed, any efforts to remediate the problem will most likely be inadequate. A more in-depth study of the Marion site and the contextual behavior of atrazine at the site will most likely be necessary.
B. Difficulties encountered
The Best Management Practices Study had no significant difficulties in the second quarter.Monthly sampling crews have faced equipment malfunction as a result of freezing weather and high-water flow conditions, but in-place contingency plans have allowed for successful completion of all sampling rounds.
The THM study continued to have problems in shipping samples to the Ogden Environmental Lab at WKU, primarily with bottles that are breaking during shipping. They are re-evaluating the approach to this and may decide to run the THM samples themselves in the future. This will give the THM study a lot more flexibility for planning experiments and will also circumvent some of the holding time problems faced.
Dr. Jeff Jack, THM project leader, has also discussed the likelihood of budget cuts to this project for next year with Task 3 manager, Dr. Chris Groves. Because of these expected reductions, sampling efforts have been reduced in the streams to focus on the large river and reservoir work. Since large river and reservoir systems are likely to have a broader impact on public water supplies, the THM group has decided to focus our limited resources on these areas. These surveys will continue throughout the rest of this year and will be formally re-evaluated in July 2000.
C. Preliminary Data Results
Best Management Practices Study
Higher than expected levels of pesticides in several of the study sites led the BMP study group to begin examining the pesticides metribuzin, trifluralin, atrazine, and simazine. Fact sheets are included for these pesticides in Appendix B-3. Raw pesticides data collected from the sites are presented in Appendix B-4.
A water quality sampling round was conducted to characterize each of the sites during high-flow conditions. This is referred to as the “wet characterization” in the project work plan. The results are presented in Appendix B-5.
Water quality sampling has been occurring on an 28-day cycle. The results are presented in Appendix B-6.
Analysis of public water supply waters for inorganic and organic chemical parameters will provide characterization for the selected sites in Kentucky during both wet and dry periods. These chemical data will provide information on concentration variation due to seasonal climatic variations as well as anthropogenic input variances such as application of agricultural pesticides. Additionally, these data will aid in identifying problem areas that will certainly warrant more specialized study such as with metals or atrazine.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for Task 3 from 10/01/99 to 03/31/00 are $34,173.63. Expenditures during the second quarter of the second year totaled $3,185.08 from the year 1 budget and $16,708.94 from the year 2 budget.
Task 3 expenditures are on schedule. The combined equipment and personnel costs for the first two quarters have expended or encumbered 58.1% of the $135,355.00 budget. $60,638.03 (44.8%) of this amount has been spent for the Trihalomethanes study emphasis under Dr. Jeffrey Jack at the University of Louisville.
Trihalomethane Study Expenditures ($60,638.03 subcontract):
Compared to our milestones, we are one month behind schedule because of the loss of the December 1999 data. We have expended or encumbered roughly 40% of our budget for the year, so we are on track financially. We expect a considerable increase in expenses over the next quarter because of the increased number of samples that will be collected during the “growing season.” We should be able to finish the first year of this project on budget. There are no discrepancies to report.
III. Changes in Key Personnel
THM Study Major Waltman has completed his work on the project and is now off the project. Rich Koch, Debbie Guelda and Tim Sellers are now in charge of the river survey. They are not receiving any salary support but they are getting travel and supply support from the project. Water quality parameters are presently being run in the Environmental Analysis Laboratory (EAL) at the University of Louisville under the direction of Mr. Richard Schulze.
There are no other key personnel changes to report in Task 3.
Task 4: Database Management and Information Tools
I. Work Status
It is the responsibility of Task 4, Database Management and Information Tools, to provide appropriate methods and structures for reporting data and metadata to meet the needs of: (1) facilitating efficient and convenient reporting of information by all other Tasks, (2) appropriate capture and storage of data and metadata by the DBMS, and (3) accessible retrieval of information and materials by end users along with ancillary information required for interpretation. The Information Tools function of our Task works to put technology, information, and the tools to create information capacity and capability directly into the hands of water providers, and to make that technology and information as accessible as possible.
A. Work progress.
Efforts by Task 4 this quarter were focused in five areas: (1) ongoing website development as a tool for providing information to water systems; (2) development of software and information tools for the direct use of water providers themselves; (3) expanding our information services to those states in EPA Region 4 beyond Kentucky; (4) ongoing construction and maintenance of the project database; and (5) reconstruction and refurbishing of donated, retired computers for use by water systems in need.
1) Ongoing website development and communication. We are continuing our offline renovation of the website in order to simplify navigation and make every section of the site more accessible. This reorganization is essential in order to efficiently deliver the rapidly growing sources of new information, software, maps, tools, documents, and links that we are developing and collecting.
2) Development of software and information tools for direct use. During this past quarter we have essentially completed the development of a computer software program for the use of small water systems in filing Monthly Operating Reports, and we are now proceeding with the final stages of debugging and refinement. The program, MOR Advisor, was constructed by Mr. Seth Johnson in the language Java to allow for both lean programming and a good graphical user interface. Further, the Java runtime utility required by the program is available for free, just as our software itself will be. We will therefore be able to efficiently provide a completely free package that does not require either pre-existing software or a particular operating system. Much additional effort has been expended to make the program function well even on machines with limited computing power.
Our first demonstration of the MOR Advisor software and of rehabilitated computers was held at a Kentucky Rural Water Association (KRWA) meeting on 1 February 2000. We have been working with KRWA staff members as a source of ongoing feedback during development, especially Mr. Dell Harris and Mr. Scott Wallace, since KRWA circuit riders will be performing much of the initial introduction of this software to the small rural water systems served by the Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality (TACWQ).
More detailed information about the program, including screen views of the user interface and the software program in operation, as well as examples of printouts of Monthly Operating Report pages from MOR Advisor, is included in Appendix C.
3) Expanding data gathering and information services to other states. It is part of our mission in the second year of EPA funding to expand our technical assistance services to the rest of the southeastern U.S. In our last quarterly report we included maps we generated showing, on a county by county basis, patterns of MCL violations by drinking water systems for states in this region from 1996 through 1998. We have invested significant effort this quarter in obtaining and verifying locational data for individual water systems so that compliance problems can be examined by watershed levels. The goal here is to identify large-scale patterns in water quality problems for the southeastern U.S. so that the solutions to these problems may be efficiently targeted.
Three members of our group received additional ArcView GIS training at the University of Kentucky in Lexington on 19-20 January 2000. This training was offered by Dr. Dan Carey as a service of the Kentucky Geological Survey for the cost of books alone.
The activities and status of current GIS tasks within Task 3 of the TACWQ is as follows:
Finding (Lat. and Long.) locations of individual Public Water Systems (70% complete)
Finding (Lat. and Long.) locations of individual Water Treatment Plants (10% complete)
Reprojecting state coverages of Land Use, Geology, and Elevation Data
Associating MCL data with Public Water Systems and Wastewater Treatment Plants (25% complete)
Learning EPA BASINS (for characterization of watersheds)
Working in conjunction with Upper Green River Watershed Watch
Creating 3-D Model of hypothesized flow routes
4) Development of project database. Microsoft SQL Server is being used to house and query the databases we have begun to accumulate. Metadata is being constructed for the GIS maps we are producing. We have made additional progress toward a final definition of the project's database structure, but are awaiting the receipt of critical information from Task 3 in order to complete the structure of a database that will house the data they are collecting. Selected data from the EPA SDWIS database have been acquired and queried in conjunction with our efforts to clarify and resolve patterns of water quality problems experienced by small water systems.
5) Rehabilitation of retired computers for use by water systems. We have nearly completed our first effort to resurrect old computers donated from departments within WKU. Nine machines have been outfitted with a Linux operating system and StarOffice, a set of Windows-like word processing and spreadsheet programs. The operating system and software have the advantage of being free for distribution, so neither the TACWQ nor the water systems will have to pay for software licenses. Each machine has also been outfitted with a new, efficient modem, a template for creating Consumer Confidence Reports, and will be given a copy of MOR Advisor, the software we have in-house for Monthly Operating Reports. The machines and software will all be provided free of charge to small water systems. KRWA has agreed to conduct selection of eligible and needy water systems and initial training of water system personnel that may receive these computers on a long-term loan basis. Applications have already been received from nine qualifying small water systems that are in need of these computers. This effort was initiated in order to provide small water companies with the electronic tools they need to operate their companies, access regulatory information, and prepare MORs electronically. We are also working with the state Division of Water so that water systems will be able to submit their reports electronically as well in the future.
B. Difficulties encountered.
No unanticipated difficulties have been encountered.
C. Preliminary data results.
See Work Progress above.
D. Anticipated activities.
Web site renovation will be a major effort next quarter as we strive to maximize its accessibility and utility for all users. We look forward to publicizing the availability of the free MOR Advisor software for distribution during the next quarter. Work will continue in our data gathering and information harvesting, with GIS as a primary mode of analysis and display of information. Ongoing development and maintenance of the structure and content of the project database will also continue. In the next quarter we will distribute rehabilitated computers for long-term loan to the small rural water systems that have applied for them. We shall also continue to respond to requests by water systems and the public for data and information on an ongoing basis.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Task 4 efforts and expenditures are on track. Total expenditures from 10/01/99 to 03/31/00 for Task 4 are $98,722.45. During the second quarter of the second year, expenditures were $31,147.42 from the first year budget and $16,708.94 from the second year budget.
III. Key Personnel Changes
There have been no changes in key personnel within Task 4 during this quarter. Dr. Ouida Meier continues to direct the efforts of Task 4. We are very fortunate in having a team of three bright, talented undergraduate students who are currently assisting with the work in Task 4 creatively and capably: Mr. Seth M. Johnson, Computer Programmer, Mr. Shane Fryer, GIS specialist, and Mr. Dave McCauley, Linux specialist. The Center is very grateful for their dedicated and skillful efforts.
Task 5: Innovative Technologies
I. Work Status:
The objectives of Task 5 are being fulfilled under three main initiatives:
Encourage pilot projects that demonstrate the benefits and effectiveness of innovative and emerging technologies in the drinking water industry
Establish Western Kentucky University Technical Assistance Center as a Field Testing Organization (FTO) for NSF & EPA
Develop a Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide for ground water and surface water.
A. Work Progress
1. Pilot Studies. During this second quarter, no pilots were visited.
2. FTO Certification. An effort was made this quarter to locate a public water supply in Kentucky to demonstrate a biological denitrification process in conjunction with Montana State. A preproposal was submitted to Montana State for funding; but because Kentucky waters do not have nitrates above the MCL, any nitrate would require spiking. Due to these reasons, no water utility in Kentucky has shown an interest in purchasing the process from a vendor, and it was decided not to pilot in Kentucky.
3. Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide. The Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide and Form for Ground Water is complete. EPA and the Kentucky DOW are reviewing these documents. The Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide and Form for Surface Water is approximately 50% complete and will be completed as time permits.
B. Difficulties Encountered
The only difficulty encountered this quarter has been in locating a site to pilot the Biological Denitrification of drinking water in Kentucky.
C. Preliminary Data Results
The Spatial Data Integration pilot at the Lake Village Water Association is continuing to produce promising results. SDI is continuing to improve the Geographic Information Systems test product, and Mr. Mike Royalty of LVWA reports that the GIS is useful to him every day.
D. Anticipated Activities
TACWQ is planning to sponsor a seminar along with the Kentucky Division of Water, the Tennessee Division of Water Supply, KRWA, and the Kentucky/Tennessee Section of the American Water Works Association. This Conference is planned for May 24 - 26, 2000 and is designed to provide technical, financial and managerial capacity to those in attendance. A representative of the Small Systems Coordinator, OGWDW, EPA will speak at this seminar.
II. Discussion of Expenditures:
Expenditures for Task 5 from 10/01/99 to 03/31/00 are $13,143.25. During the second quarter of the second year, expenses for Task 5 were $3,887.47.
III. Key Personnel Changes:
There were no personnel changes during this period.
Appendix A
These Appendixies and figures are availbable in hard copy format, if you need any of these please contact us.
Appendix B-3
Pesticide Factsheets:
Metribuzin, Trifluralin, Atrazine, and Simazine
Metribuzin Metribuzin is a selective triazine herbicide, which inhibits photosynthesis of susceptible plant species. It is primarily used for control of annual grasses and numerous broadleaf weeds in field and vegetable crops. Metribuzin is available as liquid suspension, water dispersible granular, and dry flowable formulations.
The U.S. EPA classifies Metribuzin as a slightly toxic compound, in toxicity class III. Metribuzin is slightly toxic to small animals (via oral ingestion). Studies indicate that metribuzin is moderately to slightly toxic to birds and fish. Laboratory studies have indicated there were no carcinogenic or mutagenic effects in rats receiving dietary doses of up to 15 mg/kg/day for 2 years.
Metribuzin is considered to have a moderate persistence in the soil environment. The actual half-life of metribuzin varies according to soil type and climatic conditions. Soils half-lives of 30 to 120 days have been reported; a representative value may be approximately 60 days.
Metribuzin is poorly bound to most soils and is soluble in water, giving it a potential for leaching in many soil types. Soil mobility is affected by many site-specific variables, including the amount of soil organic matter, particle size distribution, porosity, rainfall, and application rates. The major mechanism by which metribuzin is lost from soil is microbial degradation. Losses due to volatilization or photodegradation are not significant under field conditions.
If present, metribuzin would most likely be found in the water column rather than the sediment, due to its low binding affinity and high water solubility. Metribuzin has been detected consistently in the Ohio and Iowa Rivers and groundwater. However, it is not thought to be persistent since the half-life of metribuzin in the open is thought to be approximately seven days. No data concerning metribuzin’s persistence in groundwater could be located.
Trifluralin Trifluralin is a selective, preemergence dinitroaniline herbicide used to control many annual grasses and broadleaf weeds in a large variety of tree fruit, nut, vegetable, and grain crops. This type of herbicide is typically applied before weed seedlings sprout. Trifluralin works by inhibiting the growth of roots and shoots when newly germinated weed seedlings absorb it. Trifluralin should be incorporated into the soil by mechanical means within 24 hours of application.
Pesticide products containing trifluralin may be moderately toxic to relatively non-toxic, depending on the type of formulation. Trifluralin is not acutely toxic to test animals by oral, dermal or inhalation routes of exposure.
In August, 1979, trifluralin was brought under Special Review by the EPA because of the presence of an N-nitrosamine contaminant, which had been shown to cause tumors and to have mutagenic effects in animals. The principle manufacturer of trifluralin had already instituted manufacturing methods to reduce N-nitrosamine contaminant levels. The Special Review was concluded in 1982, with the requirement that N-nitrosamine contaminant levels in trifluralin not exceed 0.5 ppm, a level that the EPA believes will have no toxic effects. However, consumption of trifluralin at high levels well above the LHA level over a long period of time has been shown to cause liver and kidney damage, decreased fetal weight and size, and increased miscarriages in animal studies.
The EPA has established a Lifetime Health Advisory (LHA) level of 5 micrograms per liter (ug/l) for trifluralin in drinking water (US Environmental Protection Agency. Jan.,1989). Health Advisory Summary: Trifluralin. US EPA, Washington, DC). This means that EPA believes that water containing trifluralin at or below this level is acceptable for drinking every day over the course of one's lifetime, and does not pose any health concerns. EPA considers trifluralin to be a possible human carcinogen. Consumption of trifluralin at high levels well above the EPA's Lifetime Health Advisory level for drinking water (5 ug/l) over a long period of time has also been shown to cause liver and kidney damage, in animal studies.
Trifluralin is not hazardous to birds, but is toxic to fish and other aquatic organisms. However, its strong adsorption to soil and the usual practice of incorporating trifluralin into the soil at the time of application may prevent exposure of aquatic organisms to this herbicide. Run-off from fields should be avoided as contamination of lakes and streams could result. At exposure levels well above permissible application rates (100 ppm), trifluralin has also been shown to be toxic to earthworms.
Trifluralin is strongly adsorbed on soils (Koc = 7,000 g/ml) and nearly insoluble in water. Therefore, trifluralin is not considered to be a threat to leach into groundwater and contaminate aquifers. Because adsorption is highest in soils high in organic matter or clay content and adsorbed herbicide is inactive, higher application rates may be required for effective weed control on such soils.
Trifluralin is subject to degradation by soil microorganisms. Trifluralin remaining on the soil surface after application may be decomposed by UV light or may volatilize. The half-life of trifluralin in the soil is 45 to 60 days or about 6-8 months (at a 2.5 kg/ha application). After a period of six months to one year, 80- 90% of its activity will be gone. Recommended application rates can give season-long weed control, but fall-seeded grain crops planted in soil treated with trifluralin during the preceding spring were not injured under warm, moist conditions.
Atrazine Atrazine is a triazine herbicide used primarily for control of broadleaf and grassy weeds in soybeans and corn. Atrazine is one of the most commonly used herbicides in the United States. A USGS study of 122 river basins in the Midwest found atrazine above the MCL in 27 percent of raw water samples. Atrazine is available in both granular and liquid form.
Effects of acute exposures to atrazine include congestion of the heart, lungs, and kidneys, hypotension, antidiuresis, muscle spasms, weight loss, and adrenal degeneration. The EPA considers a one to ten day exposure of 0.1 mg/L or a seven year exposure of 0.05 mg/L to be safe for a 10-kg child consuming one liter of water per day. Chronic exposure to atrazine above the MCL may cause weight loss, retinal and muscular degeneration, cardial damage, and mammary cancer. Atrazine has been identified as a potential carcinogen for those with a lifetime exposure above the MCL.
Photodegradation and volatilization do not appear to be major factors in the fate of atrazine. Microbial activity appears to account for significant degradation of atrazine in soils.
Atrazine has an average Koc of 122, indicating medium to high mobility in soils. However, atrazine has the capacity to adsorb to colloidal materials, such as clays, metal oxides, and organic detritus, which can be found in the water column. Typically, leaching and downward infiltration of atrazine is limited by adsorption to these colloids, however, in soils with small amounts of colloidal material this may not be the case. It is also important to note that adsorption is not permanent. Fluctuations in temperature, pH, and moisture can influence the direction of the adsorption-desorption reaction.
Simazine Simazine is a triazine herbicide used for pre-emergent control of broad-leaved and grassy weeds in corn and other row crops as well as in non-crop areas such as farm ponds and hatcheries. It is often used in combination with other herbicides including atrazine, Roundup, and paraquat.
Acute exposure to simazine may cause blood changes and weight loss. Chronic exposure at levels above the MCL may cause tremors, damage to the testes, liver, and thyroid, and gene mutations. There is evidence that chronic exposure to simazine may cause cancer. The EPA considers short-term exposures of up to seven years at a concentration of up to 0.07 mg/L safe for a 10-kg child consuming one liter of water per day.
Adsorption and volatilization are not considered important in the fate of simazine under field conditions. Simazine can persist as long as three years under aquatic field conditions. Persistence in aquatic environments is variable, ranging from 50 to 700 days. The severity of weed and/or algal infestation appears to be the major factor in the persistence of this herbicide. Microbial activity and hydrolysis both contribute to degradation, however, certain catalysts such as glucose must be present for hydrolysis to occur.
Simazine has a low potential for bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms.
Quarter 3 (Progress Report Year 2 April- June 2000)
Introduction
Western Kentucky University was awarded a grant by the Environmental Protection Agency (#X826659-01-0) to establish a small public water system Technical Assistance Center (the Center). This program seeks to focus our resources and expertise toward assisting small water deliverers in achieving and maintaining capacity development. The capacity development framework offers a forum within which this Center is working with state regulatory agencies and small water systems to assist them in acquiring and maintaining technical, financial and managerial capacity needed to provide safe drinking water and achieve the public health protection goals of the EPA Safe Drinking Water Act.
Western Kentucky University has developed this Center with long range goals, and a “regional” focus. The work plan for this Center is organized into tasks that have multi-year projects all aimed at completion during a five-year program. These tasks are distinct in nature, but mutually supportive. Task 1 addresses training in managerial and financial capacity development; Task 2 provides technical capacity development in a “circuit rider” approach; Task 3 conducts field studies in 17 different watersheds in Kentucky, and analyzes methods of source water protection; Task 4 establishes a database management system and develops information tools to receive, organize, integrate and distribute project information; and Task 5 establishes a forum to identify and help evaluate innovative and alternative technology applications that can assist small system operators in the delivery of safe drinking water to their customers; Task 5 also seeks to become a Field Testing Organization (FTO) in the EPA's Environmental Testing Validation (ETV) Program.
Executive Summary
Introduction. Western Kentucky University has established a Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality for small public water systems. Information presented in this report represents efforts during the third quarter of year two of this grant.
Synopsis. This third quarter, second contract year report depicts progress in each of the aforementioned task areas. The activities of the Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality during this quarter have been focused upon presenting "Utility Management 101" courses on two occasions to water utility managers throughout the state, and in the development of two additional courses in utility organization, regulation and law, and utility finance and administration. Efforts continue in the establishment of an Associates Degree at WKU in Water Utilities Management; conducting on-site technical assistance; initial sampling, and evaluation of sites used for sources of drinking water; and identifying innovative methodologies that can provide help to small systems operators.
Task 1. The introductory course in Utility Management has been developed. The complete course symposium has been offered on two occasions during the third quarter of this contract year. This 3-day course was offered as a Kentucky Rural Water Association Management Course in April 2000, and again in June 2000. Sixty managers will be trained in year 2000. Widespread acceptance of this initial course offering was received by small utility water managers from across the state. Initial responses to a needs survey for the Associates Degree program, showing that 84 personnel from 78 water systems were interested in pursuing an Associates Degree in water utility management, were very encouraging.
Task 2. The Circuit Rider Program provided on-site, hands-on technical assistance in 53 visits to small community and non-community systems this quarter. Assistance ranged from water audits and leak detection to wellhead protection and contaminant inventories. Additionally, 38 systems received direct assistance in completing their Consumer Confidence Reports.
Task 3. Work on the Source Water Protection Initiative’s two major projects, the Best Management Practices (BMP) Study and the Trihalomethane (THM) Study, each achieved scheduled progress. The third quarter of year two was marked by a return to drought conditions throughout much of the state. Regular monthly sampling for each of the seven sites continued through the third quarter of 2000 on a 28-day schedule to June 15. As in previous quarters, the contaminants identified are primarily those associated with agricultural land use activities. Recognition of pesticides at several study sites (particularly Marion) has led the BMP group to continue analyzing for pesticides metribuzin, trifluralin, atrazine, and simazine. In the associated macroinvertebrate study, rounds one (March 2000) and two (June 2000) of sampling have been completed for Auburn, Guthrie, Cadiz, Marion, and Caneyville, and organism sorting and analysis are underway. In the THM study, we have received THM data from our second multi-watershed survey in the Ohio River and its major tributaries in Kentucky and Indiana, all of which serve as drinking water supplies. We have also continued monthly sampling protocol at one reservoir in the Salt River watershed, Taylorsville Lake, and we have begun the first mesocosm experiment assessing the relationship of THM production to algal production.
Task 4. Efforts by the Database Management and Information Tools section this quarter were focused in five areas: (1) ongoing website development as a tool for providing information to water systems; (2) development of software and information tools for the direct use of water providers themselves; (3) beginning to expand our information services to those states in EPA Region 4 beyond Kentucky; (4) ongoing construction and maintenance of the project database; and (5) reconstruction and refurbishing of donated, retired computers for use by water systems in need. A major renovation of the project's website has been undertaken. We have completed development of a computer software program for the use of small water systems in filing their Monthly Operating Reports, MOR Advisor; this software is now available for download from our website. We have begun expansion of our data gathering and information services to the other states in EPA Region 4, and present here . Development of the project database is continuing. Finally, we have completed the rehabilitation of donated older computers for free distribution to small water systems, and have developed an Operator's Manual that will be delivered with the computers to water systems during the month of July 2000.
Task 5. This quarter's work consisted of efforts with a GIS mapping program employing a modified version of ArcView that has been customized for small water systems by Spatial Data Integrations, Inc. A Sanitary Survey Self-Assessment Guide for groundwater systems has been completed, and a Guide for surface water systems will be completed in the fourth quarter of this contract year. Finally, a Western Spring Conference for water quality was hosted at WKU, bringing together small water operators, Kentucky Rural Water Association, states of Kentucky and Tennessee water authorities, EPA finance centers and the EPA Small Systems office. New rules and regulations were presented and discussed.
Costs invoiced during the second quarter, second year represent salary and fringe benefits for the Director. Costs also represent the efforts of administrative personnel and activities necessary to organize efforts in and among all five tasks, develop a cost accounting system and track accounts. Administrative responsibilities further included interaction with officials in the Kentucky Division of Water, the Kentucky Infrastructure Authority and the Kentucky Rural Water Association to assure that task activity was in accordance with the water quality objectives of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The Director also met with and gave guidance to the Task Managers in order that our activities were in accordance with the grant technical proposal and milestone schedules.
During this quarter, the Director has worked with Brents Dickinson to finalize the Sanitary Survey Self-Assessment for groundwater, and attended the Western Spring Conference (see Task 5).
The Technical Assistance Center has acquired and modified approximately 24 386/486 personal computers (PCs) that were donated by departments within Western Kentucky University. The modification and cannibalization of these computers generated nine functional computers retrofitted with software packages that will provide small water systems with word processing and spreadsheet capabilities. We have also installed on these machines software developed by Dr. Ouida Meier and Mr. Seth Johnson of the Database Management Team that will give water systems the capability to easily generate monthly water loss reports, monthly operating reports, and annual consumer confidence reports. Internet connection capacity is also provided. These PCs are now being distributed at no cost to seven water systems based upon specific selection criteria. Technical assistance is also being provided in setting up and operating the computers.
Total administrative expenditures from 04/01/00 to 06/30/00 are $18,574. The year-to-date administrative expenditures have been $47,407 out of a second year budget of $80,814. Additionally, WKU has contributed a cumulative total of $116,591.83 through the third quarter, second year (10/01/98 - 06/30/00) of the Water Quality project for all tasks combined. The budget status of all tasks is depicted in Appendix A-1. The distribution of the WKU cost sharing among tasks is shown at Appendix A-2.
Task 1: Utility Management Institute (UMI)
I. Work Status
The goal of the UMI is to develop and deliver a series of courses to be included in a “Utility Management Professional” certification program available to system managers, operators, and office managers of water systems serving rural areas and small municipalities with populations under 10,000.
A. Work Progress.
During the quarter, two presentations of the Utility Management Institute’s course “Utility Management 101” were conducted. A total of 37 utility managers participated in the presentations in Bowling Green on April 11-13, 2000 and in Lexington on June 20-22, 2000. Both sessions were well received by the participants and the course evaluations are included as an attachment to this report. Responses form both sessions reflect the positive manner of the participants, and their perception of the need for this instruction (Appendices B-1 and B-2). Work continues on the development of two new courses, “Utility Organization, Regulation & Law” and “Utility Finance & Administration.” These two-day courses will be conducted once in FY2001, as will the introductory course.
Additional progress has been made in the planning for an Associate Degree program in Utility Management. An interest survey was mailed out to 367 water and wastewater utilities in June 2000. The response rate was approximately 23% and the interest level was significantly high among all types of utilities with an overall positive response of between 75 and 80%. Copies of the returned surveys are also attached to this report. Eighty-four (84) personnel, from seventy-eight (78) systems responding, identified themselves as interested in attending a Utility Management degree program (Appendix B-3).
B. Difficulties Encountered.
No unanticipated difficulties were encountered.
C. Preliminary Data Results.
The survey data and course materials will be shared with the database manager for appropriate inclusion on the TAC website.
D. Anticipated Activities.
The introductory course will be offered twice during the year and the next two courses continue in their development stage with the participation of the WKU Center for Math, Science, and Environmental Education. During the next quarter, final course materials designed for trainer orientation and support will be completed. Copies will be available for EPA perusal and for other interested individuals and organizations.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for this task from 04/01/99 to 06/30/00 were $24,471. The year-to-date Task 1 expenditures have been $48,675 out of a second year budget of $110,610.
III. Key Personnel Changes
There were no personnel changes during the second quarter of the second year for Task 1.
Task 2: Circuit Rider Program
I. Work Status
The "Circuit Rider" approach to providing a combination of on-site technical assistance and training is nationally recognized as the most effective method of assisting small public water systems to comply with state and federal environmental regulations. The Circuit Rider program works in partnership with Kentucky Division of Water (DOW) to target the public water systems serving populations under 3,300, with particular emphasis on systems serving less than 500 people, that are experiencing profound difficulties in complying with SDWA provisions.
A. Work Progress.
During the quarter the Circuit Rider made 53 technical assistance visits to 41 non-community and community water systems spending a total of 643.75 hours on-site. Additionally, 38 systems received assistance in completing their Consumer Confidence Reports (CCRs). This assistance was conducted both on-site and electronically by sharing faxed or e-mailed information. As the CCR deadline neared, the Circuit Rider participated in an effort to remind almost 200 systems of the CCR deadline for delivery of a copy to the Division of Water.
Also, during the reporting period, the Circuit Rider performed two water audits in systems, attended a 2-day workshop on computer troubleshooting and repair, assisted with four leak detections, attended the Rural Water Rally in Washington, D.C., and was a participant at the Utility Management Institute in Lexington, KY.
B. Difficulties Encountered.
No unanticipated difficulties were encountered.
C. Preliminary Data Results.
See Work Progress above.
D. Anticipated Activities.
During the next quarter, the WKU Small System Circuit Rider will be attending NRWA’s in-service training in San Antonio, TX. Most of the technical assistance time will be spent with systems that are receiving donated computers from Western Kentucky University. The computers have been matched to seven systems that filled out applications demonstrating their need. The Circuit Rider will lead the installation and training efforts to introduce these computers to system personnel with little or no experience with computers. The computers have been loaded by Task 4 personnel with word processing software, KRWA’s Consumer Confidence Report templates and instructions, and a specially designed piece of software for the completion of Monthly Operating Reports.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for this task from 04/01/99 to 06/30/00 were $16,977. The year-to-date Task 1 expenditures have been $43,308 out of a second year budget of $64,739.
III. Key Personnel Changes
There were no personnel changes for Task 2.
Task 3: Source Water Protection Initiative
I. Work Status
A. Work Progress.
Work on the Source Water Protection Initiative’s (Task 3) two major projects, the Best Management Practices Study and the Trihalomethane Study, each achieved scheduled progress.
Best Management Practices Study
The Best Management Practices Study encompasses three programs to characterize seven study site’s source-water catchments: 1) water sampling and water analysis, 2) Geographic Information System (GIS) land use analysis, and 3) the examination of macroinvertebrates indicative of water quality. Progress for the three programs are outlined below:
Water Sampling:
The third quarter of year two was marked by a return to drought conditions throughout much of the state. In April, conditions were classified as "moderate drought" using the Palmer Drought Index calculated by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Through June most of Kentucky had slipped into the "severe drought" category. The forecast for the fourth quarter is for below normal precipitation and continued drought conditions.
As mentioned in previous reports, regular monthly sampling for each of the seven sites began in January and continued through the third quarter of 2000 on a 28-day schedule. Samples were collected over a three-day period. In April samples were collected on the 18th – 20th, in May they were collected the 16th – 18th, and in June they were collected the 13th – 15th.
A two-person sampling team was mobilized to collect the water samples at each of the seven sites.
Collection of water samples was without incident during the May and June synoptic sampling events. However, during the April sampling event the compressor for the pump at the well sites developed mechanical difficulty and required several hours of maintenance to correct the problem. A contingency plan was initiated and the samples were still delivered to the lab during the sampling period. Each of the sites appeared to be at or at near normal water levels in April. Sporadic rain events throughout May and June were substantive to provide adequate flow for synoptic sampling at all seven sites, though water levels had visibly lowered. Plans for continued monthly sampling were made for July, August, and September to close out the second year sampling. Synoptic sampling data acquired through year two will likely provide a sufficient basis for reducing sampling from monthly to quarterly during year three.
The lack of significant and sustained rain events this quarter is likely responsible for the lack of detectable pesticides in May and June. As in previous quarters, the contaminants are primarily those associated with agricultural land use activities.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Development and Land Use Analysis:
Geographic Information Systems spatial database development and land use continued during this quarter. Thus far, we have completed USGS Anderson Level III land use analysis for five of the seven study sites, including Mammoth Cave, Diamond Caverns, Auburn, Marion, and Caneyville sites. The total combined areas of the study sites is 84 square miles. Approximately 68 square miles of land use (80% of the total project) have been interpreted using remote sensing techniques and color infrared photo-interpretation. Land use classifications for the interpreted areas have been digitized and placed on the Task 3 GIS in ArcView format. In order to take advantage of existing base map datasets produced by the State of Kentucky Office of GIS, the Task 3 GIS has been converted to Kentucky State Plane, South Zone, NAD1983. Land use analysis for the Guthrie (Meriwether Spring) study site is ongoing. The basin, covering 11.95 square miles, is one of the largest of the seven study sites. Completion of land use analysis of the Guthrie and Cadiz sites, as well as creation of metadata for the existing datasets, will be completed in the fourth quarter.
Dissemination efforts related to Task 3 during the past quarter was via an oral presentation by Rhonda Pfaff (undergraduate student working on the landuse study) at the Kentucky GIS Conference. This conference was sponsored by the Governor’s Office for Technology and was held on June 6, 2000 in Bowling Green, Kentucky. The title of Ms. Pfaff’s presentation was “Landuse and Water Quality Threats to the Mammoth Cave Karst Aquifer”.
Using Stream Macroinvertebrates as Indicators of Water Quality (Dr. Scott Grubbs):
My responsibility, within the framework of Task 3 for the third quarter of Fiscal Year 1999-2000, was two-fold. The first responsibility was to continue work on creating a protocol for (a) an assessment of stream habitat, (b) collection and laboratory processing of macroinvertebrate samples, and (c) an assessment of stream health using measurements of stream habitat and macroinvertebrate structure and function. A working draft of the protocol, focusing on sampling and analysis techniques for surface-water habitats, continues to be revised as macroinvertebrate sampling is conducted from each of the seven localities. Local conditions (i.e., meso-habitat availability (e.g., wood, riffle), season, physical nature of streambed) have dictated the need for a specialized protocol to fit the biological and physical nature of local and/or regional stream structure. A "virtual" protocol, as an HTML document (as described above), is nearing completion with the aid of Mr. Brian Rix (WKU undergraduate student). I have reviewed this document and alterations will be made following testing of all collecting and analysis methods during Summer 2000. The second major responsibility was to complete two rounds of macroinvertebrate sampling of no less than five karst and/or non-karst sites throughout western Kentucky. Sampling dates for fiscal year two were selected during summer 1999 according to predicted periods of surface water flow. Two rounds of sampling were scheduled to include both early/mid-February and early/mid-April. The sampling dates were modified: round one: late February to early April; round two: June. Rounds one and two of sampling have been completed for Auburn, Guthrie, Cadiz, Marion, and Caneyville (Table 1).
Table 1. Macroinvertebrate Sampling Summary
SAMPLING LOCALITY
DATE SAMPLED
SPECIFIC LOCALITY
HABITATS
SAMPLED
SAMPLES
SORTED
SAMPLES
ANALYZED
Auburn
26 Feb. 2000
Small stream immediately below "Blue Hole Spring"
(= water intake)
Riffle
Depositional
Yes
No
Auburn
15 Feb. 2000
same as above
Riffle
Depositional
No
No
Guthrie
26 Feb. 2000
Small stream immediately below artificial impoundment
(= water intake)
Riffle
Depositional
Wood
Yes
No
Guthrie
15 June 2000
same as above
Riffle
Depositional
Wood
No
No
Cadiz
05 Mar. 2000
Small stream immediately Below concrete cistern
(= water intake)
Riffle
Depositional
Wood
Yes
No
Cadiz
15 June 2000
unable to sample
same as above
Marion
05 Mar. 2000
Outlet of upper lake
(= Lake George)
Riffle
Yes
No
Marion
15 June 2000
unable to sample
same as above but stream reduced to standing pools only
Caneyville
06 April 2000
Bennett Branch of Caney Creek, main inlet to Caneyville Reservoir, immediately upstream of Caneyville Reservoir
Riffle
Depositional
Yes
No
Caneyville
14 June 2000
same as above; but stream reduced to standing pools only
Depositional
No
No
Anticipated Activities of Macroinvertebrate Study:
By the end of the fourth quarter of Fiscal Year 1999-2000, I anticipate that macroinvertebrates from all sites will be identified. Approximately 60% of all samples have been sorted, but I have not yet initiated identification. All identification will commence and I anticipate will be completed by the end of the second fiscal year. In addition, habitat analyses need to be completed for all sites. A preliminary site characterization, which describes both habitat structure and macroinvertebrate community structure, will be available. Prior to any anticipated remediation event or BMP, the macroinvertebrate plus habitat assessment will serve as baseline data.
Trihalomethane Project (Dr. Jeffrey Jack, University of Louisville)
The work performed during this period included the following items:
We have received THM data from our second multi-watershed survey in the Ohio River and its major tributaries in Kentucky and Indiana, all of which serve as drinking water supplies. See preliminary data in Figures 1-3. These preliminary values are shown to indicate the delineation of these watersheds that our efforts are focused upon. The Environmental Analysis Laboratory at the University of Louisville is analyzing water quality parameters. Once these are assembled, we can begin the correlational analysis. This will be reported in our next quarterly report.
We have continued monthly sampling protocol at one reservoir in the Salt River watershed, Taylorsville Lake. We sampled the lake at its inflow and outflow and also at two depths, epilimnetic and hypolimnetic, in the lake proper. With the initiation of stratification, we have added another inlet (Beech Creek) to the sampling program to better assess the condition of the water entering Taylorsville reservoir.
We have begun the first mesocosm experiment assessing the relationship of THM production to algal production. This experiment is using the Ohio River Experimental Station mesocosms to conduct a controlled analysis of the impacts of algal production on THM formation potential. This experiment will end on July 7. Preliminary data will be available for the next quarterly report.
We have begun planning for a low pool river survey to be conducted in late July/early August. This survey will sample the major tributaries as before during a period in the rivers (low pool) when THM formation potential may be at a peak.
Other Task 3 Activities
During this past quarter, communications were made for the project to begin a focus on Marion, Kentucky and its atrazine problem. We are anticipating not only to continue our cooperation with the Kentucky Department of Agriculture, Division of Pesticides, Kentucky Division of Water, the Kentucky Rural Water Association, and the USGS, but also to contact Novartis (atrazine manufacturers) for possible additional support to study the noncompliance situation at Marion.
Also during the past quarter, we recognized the need for addressing problems with biological contaminants. With WKU matching funds, we purchased a fluorescent microscope for the Ogden Environmental Water Quality Lab at WKU that is capable of analyzing Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and similar microbial contaminants in supply waters.
B. Difficulties encountered
The Best Management Practices Study had no significant complications during the third quarter. Monthly sampling crews have encountered only inconsequential difficulties during sampling events.
No major difficulties have been encountered this quarter in the THM study. Samples have been shipped to WKU with no problems. We have received our budget distribution for the next fiscal year, and have adjusted our projected activities for the TACWQ accordingly.
C. Preliminary Data Results
Best Management Practices Study
Recognition of pesticides at several study sites (particularly Marion) has led the BMP group to continue analyzing for pesticides metribuzin, trifluralin, atrazine, and simazine. Raw pesticides data collected from the field sites are displayed in Appendix C-1. Water-quality sampling data occurring on a 28-day cycle are presented in Appendix C-2.
These data show the synoptic variation associated with water quality but are not specifically tied to wet or dry characterization data. The next quarterly report will provide detailed analysis of all synoptic data and compare and contrast it with wet characterization and dry characterization data.
Within the macroinvertebrate study, there are no water quality data to report in either habitat analyses or macroinvertebrate assessment. As indicated previously, macroinvertebrate samples from five sites over two sampling periods have been obtained and are in the process of being assessed. Data will be presented in the fourth quarter report.
Trihalomethane Study
Preliminary and patterns are presented and discussed in Figures 1-3, following.
Figure 1. Data and graphs from the two river surveys we have conducted (survey # 3 is scheduled for next month). In both the low and high pools of the Ohio River and major tributaries we have been seeing a similar pattern of relative THM values, although total THMs have differed. The Wabash River is a major source of THMs for the Ohio River watershed. This is a largely agricultural watershed with high levels of chlorophyll a, nutrients etc. in its flow. The largest tributaries, the Cumberland and Tennessee Rivers, do not contribute much THM to the Ohio mainstem; perhaps because of the large reservoirs they both have near their confluence with the Ohio (Lakes Barkley and Kentucky). Our preliminary data indicate that the Ohio River is acting as a sink for THMs. This may be due to dilution, in-river processing or both. We are designing mesocosm experiments to try to separate these impacts and assess their importance.
Figure 2. This is part of the dataset we have generated from Taylorsville Reservoir assessing the relation of THM formation with organic constituent concentrations. One previous study found a significant correlation between THM formation and concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). For the first 6 months of our study, we have found a correlation as well but its explanatory power is very low (R2=0.04). We are now beginning to look at more powerful statistical techniques (etc. multiple regression) to relate multiple factors to THM formation. It is likely that THM formation is a complex phenomenon in this lake.
Figure 3. This is another aspect of our Taylorsville Reservoir sampling program. Taylorsville Reservoir seems to be a source of THM for three months for which we have data analyzed, particularly in late winter/early spring. This is in contrast to the Ohio River, which seems to be a sink for THM (see above). This may be the result of the release of nutrients and increase in dissolved organics during turnover in this lake.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Task 3 expenditures are on schedule. The combined materials, analytical, and personnel cost for the first three quarters has expended and encumbered 74.7% of the $135,355.00 budget. $60,638.03 (44.8%) of this amount has been spent for the Trihalomethanes study emphasis under Dr. Jeffrey Jack at the University of Louisville.
Cost-matching from Western Kentucky University comprises an additional $43,064 in Task 3 project funds. $19,902 (46.2%) of these funds has been expended during the first three quarters of this project year. These funds have been earmarked by the university for laboratory analysis, materials, supplies, equipment, and travel. The larger percentage budget remaining in the cost-matching account reflects lessened analytical billing as a result of the major drought which continued into the project's first quarter. As parameters of concern have been identified from the BMP water sampling program, we have noticed particular problems with pesticide contamination. Over the project's second and third quarter, we have been using the funds to continue characterizing the water supplies' pesticide loads. We plan to continue the pesticide characterization during the fourth quarter.
Combined Year 2 expenditures through the third quarter for all accounts used by Task 3 (including those funded by EPA and cost-sharing by WKU) are $120,989 of $178,419 (or 67.8%). There are no discrepancies to report.
EPA expenditures for this task from 04/01/99 to 06/30/00 were $1,902 from the year 1 budget and $36,715 from the year 2 budget. The year-to-date Task 3 expenditures have been $55,895 out of a second year EPA budget of $135,355. An additional $396 remains available to Task 3 from its year 1 EPA budget.
Trihalomethane Study Expenditures ($60,638.03 subcontract):
Compared to our milestones we are one month behind schedule because of the loss of the December 1999 data. We have expended roughly 59% of our budget for the year and we have a number of outstanding bills for analysis we will need to pay next quarter. We should be able to finish the first year of this project on budget. There are no discrepancies to report
III. Changes in Key Personnel
THM Study Dale McGaha has joined the project as a graduate student researcher. Mr. McGaha will be focusing his efforts on the role microbial communities play in THM formation in “raw” waters.
There are no other key personnel changes to report in Task 3.
Task 4: Database Management and Information Tools
It is the responsibility of Task 4, Database Management and Information Tools, to provide appropriate methods and structures for reporting data and metadata to meet the needs of: (1) facilitating efficient and convenient reporting of information by all other Tasks, (2) appropriate capture and storage of data and metadata by the Database Management System, and (3) accessible retrieval of information and materials by end users along with ancillary information required for interpretation. The Information Tools function of our Task works to put technology, information, and the tools to create information capacity and capability directly into the hands of water providers, and to make that technology and information as accessible as possible.
A. Work progress.
Efforts by Task 4 this quarter continued to focus in five areas: (1) ongoing website development as a tool for providing information to water systems; (2) development of software and information tools for the direct use of water providers themselves; (3) expanding our information services to those states in EPA Region 4 beyond Kentucky; (4) ongoing construction and maintenance of the project database; and (5) reconstruction and refurbishing of donated, retired computers for use by water systems in need.
1) Ongoing website development and communication. We have made a great deal of progress in the renovation of our website in order to simplify navigation and make every section of the site more accessible. The address of the new site, nearing completion, will be http://water.wku.edu. This reorganization is essential in order to efficiently deliver the rapidly growing sources of new information, software, maps, tools, documents, and links that we are developing and collecting.
2) Development of software and information tools for direct use. In-house development of a piece of software, MOR Advisor, to facilitate the completion and filing of Monthly Operating Reports by small water systems, has been completed, tested, debugged, finalized, and was made available for free download from our website during the past quarter. It can be found at URL http://waterquality.bio.wku.edu/MOR/. We plan to gather information from water systems that are trying out this software to get feedback on its efficacy. The program MOR Advisor was constructed by Mr. Seth Johnson, a WKU student, in the language Java to allow for both lean programming and a good graphical user interface. Further, the Java runtime utility required by the program is available for free, just as our software itself is. We will therefore be able to efficiently provide a completely free package that does not require either pre-existing software or a particular operating system. Much additional effort has been expended to make the program function well even on machines with limited computing power. The program has also been optimized to run under both Windows and Linux operating environments.
3) Data gathering and information services to Kentucky and other states. It is part of our mission in this second year of EPA funding to begin expanding our technical assistance services to the rest of the southeastern U.S. A primary goal of the mapping effort presented here is to identify large-scale patterns in water quality problems for the southeastern U.S. so that the solutions to these problems may be efficiently targeted.
We present here a detailed summary of the status of Kentucky's public water and sewer systems showing the counties and number of people lacking these essential services (Figures 1-2). These maps are based on information recently made available by the Kentucky Water Resource Development Commission. In this report we also present a new series of information maps of patterns of water quality problems across the southeastern US, including all of EPA Region 4, plus Virginia and West Virginia. These maps are included at the end of this section (Figures 3-13). A description of the patterns observed so far in these maps is presented under Preliminary Data Results.
4) Development of project database. Microsoft SQL Server is being used to house and query the databases we have begun to accumulate. Metadata is being constructed for the GIS maps we are producing. We have made additional progress toward a final definition of the project's database structure, but are still awaiting the receipt of critical information from Task 3 in order to complete the structure of a database that will house the data they are collecting. Selected data from the EPA SDWIS database have been acquired and queried in conjunction with our efforts to clarify and resolve patterns of water quality problems experienced by small water systems.
5) Rehabilitation of retired computers for use by water systems. We originally proposed to look into the possibility of renovating computers for water systems this year. From a collection of 25 available machines, we have completed the preparation and refurbishing of nine old computers donated for long-term loan to water systems in need of computing power. This effort is finally coming to completion after a very long series of encountering technical problems and developing solutions to them. All students involved in this work are to be commended for their effort and persistence. All computers and associated equipment (monitors, mice, keyboards, modems) have been submitted to a final check and cleaning. We have also written a detailed Operator's Manual to accompany these machines (Appendix D-1). We will deliver the machines to KRWA for distribution by early July 2000. A Press Release has been scheduled for that date as well (Appendix D-2). Feedback request forms were included with the Operator's Manual to help evaluate needs and utilities for donated computers the TACWQ might distribute in future.
B. Difficulties encountered.
No insurmountable difficulties have been encountered.
C. Preliminary data results.
A visual description of Kentucky residents lacking basic public water service and sewer service is presented in Figures 4-5. The raw data behind this map, aggregated by the Kentucky Water Resources Development Commission, shows that a total of 15% of Kentucky residents (almost 0.6 million people) are without public water service of any type, while 44% of Kentucky residents (over 1.7 million people) are without public sewer service of any type. A plan to provide public water service to remaining residents without providing public sewer service as well has obvious potential for creating new water quality problems, especially in the underserved Appalachian region of Kentucky with its current known problems with straight pipes.
Records of MCL violations during 1998 have been mapped on a county by county basis for each state in the southeastern U.S. (EPA Region 4, plus West Virginia as we expand our information services). The information included in the maps in Figures 6-19 allows one to evaluate patterns and assert priorities based on several parameters: density of water systems with problems, number of people affected, and percent of population affected.
For the whole southeastern U.S., the number of people affected by MCL violations in each county is shown as 3-D extrusions, using two different points of view, in Figures 6 and 7. Areas that stand out in both maps as having problems affecting a large number of people include Miami, central Florida, eastern Tennessee, northern Alabama, the Appalachian region, and coastal areas along parts of the Atlantic Bight and the Gulf coast.
In Figures 8-19, two conventions, dots and shading, are used to simultaneously represent number of water systems in a county with a given violation (dots) and percent of county population affected (shading). Each dot represents one water system within a county with a given violation, while colors are used to distinguish different types of MCL violations. Shading is used to represent affected population percent in each county by quartiles.
Using this scheme, a view of the entire southeastern U.S. is presented in Figure 8. This map suggests that, overwhelmingly, the greatest drinking water quality problems experienced in this region of the U.S. are in the form of fecal coliform violations. Taken with the previous figures, several areas stand out as having problems in a few water systems that serve large populations, including the Miami region of Florida, the northeastern tip of Tennessee, north-central Alabama, and northwestern Georgia. Several regions stand out as having problems with many, many water systems; since those counties have such a large number of water systems, most of these are likely to be small water systems. These areas include the central, northeastern, and Miami areas of Florida; western Tennessee; selected coastal segments of Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina; central South Carolina; and Appalachian regions of northeast Georgia, eastern Tennessee, western and central North Carolina, and southern West Virginia. Data for other eastern states will help complete this picture.
Figures 9-11 show how water quality violations have decreased in Kentucky from 1996-1998, and also reveal regions of the state that have had consistent problems over time. These regions may have chronic source water problems, or may have ongoing problems with particular water systems. In Figures 12-19, MCL violations by state can be seen more clearly. In addition to specific regions of states with numerous fecal coliform problems, the number of fluoride violations in coastal South Carolina and the number of nitrate problems in far eastern West Virginia and parts of North Carolina are very surprising, and bear further investigation.
Maps such as these can help immensely in focusing projects for greater effectiveness, such as determining areas most suitable for regionalization, or targeting areas where a Small Systems Circuit Rider program has the greatest potential for effecting improved SDWA compliance.
We look forward to developing a fuller picture by creating maps for more states, and by examining these patterns over time. We are also in the process of converting these maps into clickable image maps that can be used over the internet to link to queries of the EPA SDWIS (Safe Drinking Water Information System) database for instant detailed information. It is hoped that this information will help define the problems and issues at hand more clearly than previously possible.
D. Anticipated activities.
Continuing website renovation will be a major effort next quarter as we strive to maximize its accessibility and utility for all users. We look forward to further publicizing the availability of the free MOR Advisor software for distribution during the next quarter, and will begin to gather feedback on its use and also begin to develop versions for use in other states. Work will continue in our data gathering and information harvesting, with GIS as a primary mode of analysis and display of information. Ongoing development and maintenance of the structure and content of the project database will also continue. In the next quarter we will distribute rehabilitated computers for long-term loan to the small rural water systems that have applied for them. We shall also continue to respond to requests by water systems and the public for data and information on an ongoing basis.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for this task from 04/01/99 to 06/30/00 were $20,311. The year-to-date Task 1 expenditures have been $53,394 out of a second year budget of $99,401.
III. Key Personnel Changes
There have been no changes in key personnel within Task 4 during this quarter. Dr. Ouida Meier continues to direct the efforts of Task 4. We are very fortunate in having a team of four bright, talented undergraduate students who are currently assisting with the work in Task 4 very creatively and capably: Mr. Seth M. Johnson, Computer Programmer, who has developed the MOR Advisor software and User's Guide, contributed significantly to the preparation and final check of the loaner computers, and harvested data from the EPA SDWIS database; Mr. Shane Fryer, GIS Specialist, who plotted the maps that appear in this report and developed new modes of information layout; Ms. Kim Gaines, Research Assistant, who is tracking down information on source water quality to extend our analyses; and Mr. Jake Lyon, Linux Specialist, who was responsible for a final check of the loaner computers, authored the loaner computer Operator's Manual, and is now assisting with website renovation. The Center is very grateful for their dedicated and skillful efforts.
Task 5: Innovative Technologies
I. Work Status:
The objectives of task 5 have developed into the following four main headings.
Encourage pilot projects that demonstrate the benefits and effectiveness of innovative and emerging technologies in the drinking water industry.
Establish Western Kentucky University Technology Assistance Center (Center) as a Field Testing Organization (FTO) for NSF and EPA.
Develop a Sanitary Survey Self-Assessment Field Guide for Ground Water and Surface Water operators.
Develop a Spring Conference at the Center each year to present new innovative technologies and new rules and regulations promulgated by EPA.
A. Work Progress
Pilot Studies. During this third quarter, no pilots were visited.
FTO Certification. Due to funding constraints and lack of pilot studies, FTO certification has had no activity in this quarter.
Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide. The Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide and Form for Ground Water has been reviewed by EPA and the Kentucky Division of Water and is now being edited by the Center. The Sanitary Survey Self-Assessment Field Guide and Form for Surface Water is approximately 60% complete and will be completed during the fourth quarter of this year.
Western Spring Conference. The first annual Western Spring Conference was held at the Center on May 24th thru May 26th, 2000. This conference was a joint effort by this Center, University of Louisville Financial Center, Kentucky Rural Water Association, Kentucky-Tennessee Section American Water Association, Kentucky Division of Water and the Tennessee Division of Water Quality. The first day was given to the state regulatory agencies of Kentucky and Tennessee to present the SDWA and the Amendments of 86 and 96. The second day was devoted to innovative technologies, the University of Louisville rate presentation, and other treatment techniques. On the third day, Mark Mazzola as a representative of US EPA presented upcoming rules and regulations that operators must understand and implement, and KRWA described their Management Institute being developed over the next three years.
B. Difficulties Encountered
There have been no difficulties encountered.
C. Preliminary Data Results
Pilot Studies – The final report of the Spatial Data Integration pilot at the Lake Village Water Association is attached as an addendum to this Task section (Attachment #1).
Western Spring Conference – There were 40 registered water operators and managers in attendance. The evaluation sheets returned indicated that the conference was a great success.
D. Anticipated Activities
The Sanitary Survey Field Guide and Form for Ground Water and Surface Water should be complete by the end of the fourth quarter. Western Kentucky Technical Assistance Center plans to hold the Spring Conference each year to keep small water system operators and managers up to date with new technology and drinking water regulations (these two ventures will be pursued utilizing WKU matching funds).
II. Discussion of Expenditures:
Expenditures for this task from 04/01/99 to 06/30/00 were $1,284. The year-to-date Task 1 expenditures have been $5,742 out of a second year budget of $9,081.
III. Key Personnel Changes:
There were no personnel changes during this period.
Task 5, Innovative Technologies: Attachment #1
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
LAKE VILLAGE WATER ASSOCIATION, BURGIN, KENTUCKY
JULY, 1999 - JUNE, 2000
FINAL REPORT
In June, 1999 the Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality (TACWQ) at Western Kentucky University, the Kentucky Rural Water Association (KRWA), and Spatial Data Integrations, Inc. (SDI) announced the establishment of an Innovative Technology Demonstration Project to illustrate the advantages of using a GIS (Geographic Information System) for facilities management at small water utilities. Lake Village Water Association (LVWA) of Burgin, Kentucky was chosen as the site for the project which ran from July 1999 through June 2000. LVWA , which has 1750 customers and more than 83 miles of mains, is headed by Mike Royalty who was the principal tester for the project.
In July, 1999 SDI provided LVWA with base maps for its service area. These maps included seamless digital topographic maps prepared from USGS DRGs (Digital Raster Graphics), digital aerial photography produced from USGS DOQQs (Digital Orthophotograhic Quarter Quadrangles) and an elevation grid produced from USGS DEMs (Digital Elevation Models). SDI also provided LVWA with WaterWorks/FM™ -- a GIS system developed by SDI, to enable small and medium-sized utilities to digitize and display mains, valves, hydrants, service lines, meters and other facilities information on a digital map. Once this system information is "drawn" and keyed into the program, the software enables the utility to analyze its system data to assist with facilities management, customer service, long-range planning and other operational issues.
In August, 1999 Mike Royalty began "drawing" his mains into the software using the aerial photography as his point of reference. As mains were added, the lines were automatically snapped together by the software to ensure connectivity. Then point features were added including fittings, valves, and hydrants among others. Service lines were added to connect meters to the mains. As each service line was drawn on the map, the software automatically snapped the service to the main and added a saddle at the main and a meter at the other end of the line. As Mr. Royalty had free moments, he worked on entering more data into the system. By early 2000 he was ready to begin adding information into the system to describe the attributes of the features that he had drawn on the map. By the end of June, 2000 LVWA has completed digitizing all of its mains, meters, valves, hydrants, and other features and was well into the task of coding the information about these features.
Throughout the year, Mike Royalty has freely shared his time and information with other utility managers who have been interested in GIS. He has participated in a number of meetings in which he has discussed the demonstration project and how GIS is being utilized in his system. In June 2000 he was on the program at the KYGIS conference in Bowling Green to talk about his experience with the demonstration project. He is now a strong advocate for utility operators to use GIS in the management of their operations. Among the anecdotes which Mr. Royalty shared at the conference were these:
A resident showed up at board meeting and wanted to know what it would cost to get water hooked up to his property. Using the GIS software, Mike was able to locate the resident's property on the map, use a measuring tool in the software to calculate the distance from the closest main to the man's property, and provide an estimate on the spot. Prior to having the GIS software, Mike would have had to go out to the property, use a wheel to calculate the distance, and then prepare a quote for the resident--a process that normally took at least a week.
Using a Leak Tracker component that comes with WaterWorks/FM, Mike was able to determine that several leaks had occurred along the same 10-mile section of pipe and was able to recommend to his board that the whole section be replaced to avoid further service interruptions and water losses.
LVWA is in the process of completing the entry of existing features into its GIS system. A key advantage that LVWA has found in using GIS is that its system map need never be out of date. As new water mains and service lines are put in the ground they can be added to the digital mapping system. As repairs take place on older mains in the system where size and material were unknown, this data can be recorded in the GIS. Having all of the system information in one place is a real convenience for LVWA.
Quarter 4 (Progress Report Year 2 July- September 2000)
Introduction
Western Kentucky University was awarded a grant by the Environmental Protection Agency (#X826659-01-0) to establish a small public water system Technical Assistance Center (the Center). This program seeks to focus our resources and expertise toward assisting small water deliverers in achieving and maintaining capacity development. The capacity development framework offers a forum within which this Center is working with state regulatory agencies and small water systems to assist them in acquiring and maintaining technical, financial and managerial capacity needed to provide safe drinking water and achieve the public health protection goals of the EPA Safe Drinking Water Act.
Western Kentucky University has developed this Center with long range goals, and a “regional” focus. The work plan for this Center is organized into tasks that have multi-year projects all aimed at completion during a five-year program. These tasks are distinct in nature, but mutually supportive. Task 1 addresses training in managerial and financial capacity development; Task 2 provides technical capacity development in a “circuit rider” approach; Task 3 conducts field studies in 17 different watersheds in Kentucky, and analyzes methods of source water protection; Task 4 establishes a database management system and develops information tools to receive, organize, integrate and distribute project information; and Task 5 establishes a forum to identify and help evaluate innovative and alternative technology applications that can assist small system operators in the delivery of safe drinking water to their customers; Task 5 also seeks to become a Field Testing Organization (FTO) in the EPA's Environmental Testing Validation (ETV) Program.
Executive Summary
Introduction. Western Kentucky University has established a Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality for small public water systems. Information presented in this report represents efforts during the fourth quarter of year two of this grant and summary information for the whole of year two.
Synopsis. This fourth quarter, second contract year report depicts progress in each of the aforementioned task areas. The activities of the Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality during this quarter have been focused upon presenting "Utility Management 101" courses on two occasions to water utility managers throughout the state, and in the development of two additional courses in utility organization, regulation and law, and utility finance and administration. Efforts continue in the establishment of an Associates Degree at WKU in Water Utilities Management; conducting on-site technical assistance; sampling and analysis of sites used for sources of drinking water; developing and distributing information and information tools; and identifying innovative methodologies that can provide help to small systems operators.
Task 1. The introductory course in Utility Management has been developed. The complete course symposium has been offered on two occasions during this contract year. This 3-day course was offered as a Kentucky Rural Water Association Management Course in April 2000, and again in June 2000. Sixty managers will be trained in year 2000. Widespread acceptance of this initial course offering was received by small utility water managers from across the state. Initial responses to a needs survey for the Associates Degree program, showing that 84 personnel from 78 water systems were interested in pursuing an Associates Degree in water utility management, were very encouraging.
Task 2. The Circuit Rider Program provided on-site, hands-on technical assistance in 228 visits to small community and non-community systems this year, spending a total of 457 hours on-site in addition to other program hours. Assistance ranged from water audits and leak detection to wellhead protection and contaminant inventories. Additionally, 81 systems received direct assistance in completing their Consumer Confidence Reports.
Task 3. Work on the Source Water Protection Initiative's two major projects, the Source Water Demonstration Watershed Study Study and the Trihalomethane (THM) Study, each achieved scheduled progress. After our first year of sampling we have identified two main sources of significant source water quality impairment in the sourcewater demonstration watersheds: 1) pesticides, 2) microbial organisms. We continued to develop our Arc View GIS database and classify land use in the seven demonstration watersheds. The major accomplishments this quarter include: (1) completing Anderson Level III land use/land cover analysis for all sites, (2) field checking, (3) writing metadata for the GIS files, and (4) beginning to relate land use threats to water quality. The THM Project work performed during this period included 1) continued sampling of the nine THM survey sites (large river sites and Taylorsville Lake) discussed in the earlier quarter reports from the year, and 2) a series of experiments to determine the effects of algal growth on THM production.
Task 4. Efforts by the Database Management and Information Tools section this year were focused in five areas: (1) website renovation and development as an ongoing means of providing current information directly to water systems; (2) development of software and information tools for the direct use of water providers; (3) expanding our information services beyond Kentucky to those states in EPA Region 4 and adjoining areas; (4) ongoing construction and maintenance of the project database; and (5) reconstruction and refurbishing of donated, retired computers for use by water systems in need. A major renovation of the project's website has been completed. We have also completed development and subsequently refined a computer software program for the use of small water systems in filing their Monthly Operating Reports, MOR Advisor; this software is available for download from our website. A programmed spreadsheet which assists in the calculation of Monthly Water Losses for small water systems has also been completed and is available for download. We have begun expansion of our data gathering and information services to the other states in EPA Region 4 and beyond, and present here information from those states. Development of the project database continues as an ongoing effort. Finally, we have completed the rehabilitation of donated older computers for free distribution to small water systems, and have developed an Operator's Manual that is being delivered with the computers to water systems.
Task 5. This year's work included completion of efforts with a GIS mapping program employing a modified version of ArcView that has been customized for small water systems by Spatial Data Integrations, Inc. A Sanitary Survey Self-Assessment Guide for groundwater systems has been completed, and a Guide for surface water systems is nearing completion. Finally, a Western Spring Conference for water quality was hosted at WKU, bringing together small water operators, Kentucky Rural Water Association, states of Kentucky and Tennessee water authorities, EPA finance centers and the EPA Small Systems office. New rules and regulations were presented and discussed.
Administration
Costs invoiced during the fourth quarter, second year represent salary and fringe benefits for the Director. Costs also represent the efforts of administrative personnel and activities necessary to organize efforts in and among all five tasks, develop a cost accounting system and track accounts. Administrative responsibilities further included interaction with officials in the Kentucky Division of Water, the Kentucky Infrastructure Authority and the Kentucky Rural Water Association to assure that task activity was in accordance with the water quality objectives of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The Director also met with and gave guidance to the Task Managers in order that our activities were in accordance with the grant technical proposal and milestone schedules.
A. Activities:
During this year, the Director has worked with Brents Dickinson to finalize the Sanitary Survey Self-Assessment for groundwater, and attended the Western Spring Conference (see Task 5).
The Technical Assistance Center has acquired and modified approximately 24 386/486 personal computers (PCs) that were donated by departments within Western Kentucky University. The modification and cannibalization of these computers generated nine functional computers retrofitted with software packages that will provide small water systems with word processing and spreadsheet capabilities. We have also installed on these machines software developed by Dr. Ouida Meier and Mr. Seth Johnson of the Database Management Team that will give water systems the capability to easily generate monthly water loss reports, monthly operating reports, and annual consumer confidence reports. Internet connection capacity is also provided. These PCs are now being distributed at no cost to eight water systems based upon specific selection criteria. Technical assistance is also being provided in setting up and operating the computers.
B. Expenditures:
Total administrative expenditures from 07/01/00 to 09/30/00 are $28,483. The year-to-date administrative expenditures have been $75,890 out of a second year budget of $80,814. Additionally, WKU has contributed a cumulative total of $126,865 through the fourth quarter, second year (10/01/98 - 09/30/00) of the Water Quality project for all tasks combined. The budget status of all tasks is depicted in Appendix A.
Task 1: Utility Management Institute (UMI)
I. Work Status
The goal of the UMI is to develop and deliver a series of courses to be included in a “Utility Management Professional” certification program available to system managers, operators, and office managers of water systems serving rural areas and small municipalities with populations under 10,000.
A. Work Progress.
During the year, two presentations of the Utility Management Institute's course "Utility Management 101" were conducted. A total of 37 utility managers participated in the presentations in Bowling Green on April 11-13, 2000 and in Lexington on June 20-22, 2000. Both sessions were well received by the participants, and the course evaluations were included as an attachment to the year two, third quarter report. Work continues on the development of two new courses, "Utility Organization, Regulation & Law" and "Utility Finance & Administration." These two-day courses will be conducted once each in FY2001.
The trainer material for "Utility Management 101" was successfully produced and shared with the appropriate program partners, including USEPA and the Technical Assistance Center. A copy of the 176-page trainer manual is attached to this report (Appendix B). The Utility Management Institute has planned four course presentations for 2001. Utility Management 101 will be presented twice during 2001 and the two new courses will each be presented once during the year.
Additional progress has been made in the planning for an Associate Degree program in Utility Management. An interest survey was mailed out to 367 water and wastewater utilities in June 2000. The response rate was approximately 23% and the interest level was significantly high among all types of utilities with an overall positive response of between 75 and 80%. Copies of the returned surveys were submitted with the year two, third quarter report.
B. Difficulties Encountered.
No unanticipated difficulties were encountered.
C. Preliminary Data Results.
The survey data and course materials will be shared with the database manager for appropriate inclusion on the TAC website.
D. Anticipated Activities.
The introductory course will be offered twice during the next year and the next two courses each presented once during the year. The WKU Center for Math, Science, and Environmental Education will continue to be a partner in developing course materials. During the next year, final course materials designed for trainer orientation and support will be completed for the two new courses. Copies will be available for EPA perusal and for other interested individuals and organizations.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for this task from 07/01/00 to 09/30/00 were $36,510. The year-to-date Task 1 expenditures have been $85,184 out of a second year budget of $110,610.
III. Key Personnel Changes
There were no personnel changes during the second quarter of the second year for Task 1.
Figure 1. Example of classroom instruction for water system managers provided by KRWA.
Task 2: Circuit Rider Program
I. Work Status
The "Circuit Rider" approach to providing a combination of on-site technical assistance and training is nationally recognized as the most effective method of assisting small public water systems to comply with state and federal environmental regulations. The Circuit Rider program works in partnership with Kentucky Division of Water (DOW) to target the public water systems serving populations under 3,300, with particular emphasis on systems serving less than 500 people, that are experiencing profound difficulties in complying with SDWA provisions.
A. Work Progress.
During the year the Circuit Rider made 228 technical assistance visits with non-community and community water systems spending a total of 457 hours on-site out of a total of 2408 program hours. Additionally, the Circuit Rider worked with 81 systems in completing their Consumer Confidence Reports for 2000. This assistance was conducted both on-site and electronically by sharing faxed or e-mailed information. As the CCR deadline neared, the Circuit Rider participated in an effort to remind almost 200 systems of the CCR deadline for delivery of a copy to the Division of Water.
Also, during the reporting period, the Circuit Rider performed 7 water audits in systems, attended a 2-day workshop on computer troubleshooting and repair, assisted with 11 leak detections, attended the Rural Water Rally in Washington, D.C., and was a participant at the Utility Management Institute in Lexington, KY. The Circuit Rider also attended approved training at NRWA's in-service training in San Antonio and Kansas City.
Much of the technical assistance time during the fourth quarter was spent with systems that received donated computers from Western Kentucky University. The computers have been matched to seven systems that filled out applications demonstrating their need. The Circuit Rider led the installation and training efforts to introduce these computers to system personnel with little or no experience with computers. The computers have been loaded with word processing software, KRWA's Consumer Confidence Report templates and instructions, and a piece of software for the completion of Monthly Operating Reports specially designed by Task 4.
B. Difficulties Encountered.
No unanticipated difficulties were encountered.
C. Preliminary Data Results.
See Work Progress above.
D. Anticipated Activities.
During the next quarter, the WKU Small System Circuit Rider will continue to work with systems that we have placed WKU-donated computers. Other activities will include regular technical assistance and training.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for this task from 07/01/00 to 09/30/00 were $11,618. The year-to-date Task 2 expenditures have been $54,926 out of a second year budget of $64,739.
III. Key Personnel Changes
There were no personnel changes for Task 2.
Attachment: Summary of Water System Contacts and On-Site Visits for the 1999-2000 year by Scott Wallace, Small Systems Circuit Rider.
WKU Circuit Rider
Oct 99-Sep 00
Date
Contacts
On-Site Hours
Average On-Site
Hours per Contact
Total Hours
For Month
Oct 99
33
42.75
1.25
196.75
Nov 99
15
19.00
1.25
194.50
Dec 99
33
61.75
2.00
217.50
Jan 00
19
37.00
2.00
178.50
Feb 00
10
14.25
1.50
192.50
Mar 00
25
45.25
2.00
203.50
Apr 00
24
65.75
2.75
202.00
May 00
5
11.75
2.25
206.75
Jun 00
18
38.25
2.00
227.00
Jul 00
14
29.75
2.00
190.50
Aug 00
20
55.25
2.75
228.50
Sep 00
12
36.25
3.00
171.25
Total Contacts: 228
Total On-Site Hours: 457
Average On-Site Hours per Contact: 2.0
Total Program Hours for Year: 2408.27
Total Consumer Confidence Reports completed: 81
Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality, WKU
Small System Circuit Rider Program
February Highlight
WKU Circuit Rider Program
My highlight this month is a water audit I did for the city of Fredonia. They called the office requesting that we come in and completely go over their entire distribution system. Their actual loss was only 17-20 gal/min. but it did give me the opportunity to look at their maps and point out areas that monitor meters would be very effective. As of now the only way they are able to check large portions of their distribution system is either customer complaints, or just come up on the leak. The operator was very receptive of the ideal and we were able to locate areas on his map to set the monitor meters. We also pinpointed some suspect 3 inch meters that have been in use for over twenty-five years and to the operators knowledge have never been tested or changed. They also have some municipal buildings that currently are not being metered. We talked about getting them at least metered even if the city chose not to bill them. Overall I think the audit went well. I left the operator a punch list of things to accomplish and areas to check out and I will check back at a later time and see how things are going.
March Highlight
WKU Circuit Rider Program
My March highlight is a leak detection I did for West McCracken Water District. They called the office requesting that we come in and look for a leak they have been having for about three months. Their actual loss was about 2,000,000 gallons a month. They purchase from the city of Paducah and the leak was costing them over $100.00 dollars a day. Upon arriving on-site Bill had already narrowed the leak down to a small zone in his distribution system. After reviewing all the data collected by the district we then began looking for their leak out in the field. The area we were looking in had cast-iron and ductile mains with an estimated 50 gal/min leak in that section. We were unable to hear any sounds or evidence that a leak was occurring but the numbers kept pointing to that area. We then regrouped and Clem took the information we had collected to Bowling Green leting Barry review the data looking to see if there was anything that we had missed on-site. I contacted Dell and arranged to use his flow meter to verify the amount of water that was actually going into the zone in question. After talking to Clem we both agreed that the TVA meter should be the first area to check with the flow meter. The flow meter did show about 45-50 gal/min difference between the flow meter and the meter that was installed. Bill called and ordered a new three-inch meter and had it installed three days later. I called and checked in with Bill to see how the new meter was working. He told me that the flow went from 24 gal/min on the old meter to 70-75 gal/min with the new meter. The leak cost the Water District over $9,000.00 dollars they are looking into back billing TVA to recoup their losses.
April Highlight
WKU Circuit Rider Program
My highlight this month is a water audit I did for the city of Jenkins. They called the office requesting that we come in and completely go over their entire distribution system. Their actual loss was very substantial. Earlier in the month I spent four days going over their entire system with Barry Back and Steve Basham. Using flow meters and valving the system down to defined areas we were able to locate the sections that most of their water loss was occurring. We did find numerous small leaks but with their manpower and the system setup we were unable to locate the amount of water that we determined was being lost. On a return visit we had more equipment and located three more valves to isolate section we had determined as a major loss area. We did find a leak major leak that was losing well over 50 GPM.
June Highlight
WKU Circuit Rider Program
Steve Basham and myself spent four more days in Caney Creek trying to bring their treatment plant into compliance. On this visit we spent most of our time on chemical feeders and separating the pre and post chlorination. We installed a new regal tank mounted chlorinator for the pre and ran new lines to tie into the existing plumbing. Initially none of the chlorine was making it out of the flash mix and holding a residual, but after installing the new system we were able to carry a residual all the way to the top of the filters. We also cleaned and repaired the alum feeder to enhance flocculation in the settling basin. We determined that using lime was hurting the treatment process so we shut down the lime feeder. One major item we repaired at the plant was replacing the filter flow controller floats. The plant had been running wide open at over double the designed capacity through the filters. By slowing the filters down it not only gave the filters a chance to do their job but also gave the settling basin a chance to let some of the floc to form and settle out. When we arrived on-site the finished water turbidity was about 5 NTU’s. After three days of maintenance and chemical adjustments we were able bring it down to 0.9 NTU’s. Three days after we left the system Tom Stern from Division of Water (DOW) stopped by and the turbidity had came down to 0.34 NTU’s. To date KRWA has saved Caney Creek approximately $15,000 and has shown DOW that they are now in compliance with all regulatory requirements. I will be returning to Caney Creek at the end of July to oversee the removal and replacement of their filter media.
Figure 2. Examples of different kinds of direct assistance provided to water systems, including: a) construction advice, (b) onsite instruction, and (c) finding and repairing leaks.
Task 3: Source Water Protection Initiative
I. Work Status
A. Work Progress.
Work on the Source Water Protection Initiative’s two major projects, the Source Water Demonstration Watershed Study and the Trihalomethane Study, each achieved scheduled progress.
Source Water Demonstration Watershed Study
The Source Water Demonstration Watershed Study encompasses three programs to characterize seven study site’s source-water catchments: 1) water sampling and water analysis, 2) Geographic Information System (GIS) land use analysis, and 3) the examination of macroinvertebrates indicative of water quality. Progress for the three programs are outlined below:
Water Sampling:
Moisture conditions throughout Kentucky moderated during the fourth quarter. As of September 25, the eastern half of the state in “near normal” conditions and the western and central areas in “mild drought” conditions classified using the Palmer Drought Index calculated by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
As mentioned in previous reports, regular monthly sampling for each of the seven sites began in January and continued through the quarter on the same 28-day schedule as reported throughout the year, with samples of each month’s round collected over a three-day period. During the fourth quarter, samples were collected on July 11-13, August 8-10, and September 5-7. In each case, two-person sampling team was mobilized to collect the water samples at each of the seven sites, and these were collected without incident. The water quality data from the quarter’s sampling rounds are given in Appendices C1-C3.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Development and Land Use Analysis:
In the fourth quarter, we continued to develop our Arc View GIS database and classify land use in the seven demonstration watersheds. The major accomplishments this quarter include: (1) completing Anderson Level III land use/land cover analysis for all sites, (2) field checking, (3) writing metadata for the GIS files, and (4) beginning to relate land use threats to water quality.
The land use analysis employed the Anderson land use classification (Anderson, et al. 1976). This hierarchical system is divided into three levels, with a higher level representing a greater level of detail. A one digit number represents seven broad categories of Level I land use, including agriculture, urban development, rangeland, water, wetlands, barren land, and forestland. Level II is broken into 29 categories that are depicted by a two-digit number. Level III is most detailed, with a three or more digit number representing over 100 land-use types.
Anderson Level III land use classification at 1:24,000-scale was conducted for the 220.7 square kilometers that make up the demonstration watersheds, including the land use polygons that extend beyond basin boundary lines A base map for land use parcels was constructed using ArcView GIS software. The base map consisted of 1:12,000 digital orthophoto quarter quadrangles (DOQQ’s) in the Universal Transmercator North American Datum 1927, Zone 16 coordinate system. Parcel shapes and land use codes interpreted from the color infrared images were then transposed to the base map.
Using Stream Macroinvertebrates as Indicators of Water Quality (Dr. Scott Grubbs):
The responsibility of this portion of Task III during Fiscal Year 2 (September 1999 - October 2000) was two-fold: 1) first, to prepare a working protocol for (a) an assessment of stream habitat of typical surface fluvial systems immediately upstream or downstream of rural drinking water reservoirs, (b) an assessment of stream habitat for surface fluvial systems immediately adjacent to large springs that serve as rural water supplies, (c) a 'rapid' collection and laboratory processing of stream macroinvertebrate samples, and (d) assessment of stream health by integrating habitat and macroinvertebrate community quality. A 'virtual protocol', to be available either as an on-line HTML or PDF document is currently in preparation; 2) second, to perform assessment (habitat plus biological) of three karst and two non-karst sites in western Kentucky. The results are discussed in Section C below.
Prior to the first quarter the next fiscal year: three items will be completed: (a) a second round of sampling will occur at the Cadiz site; (b) an additional 100 organisms will be sorted from each sample to evaluate the importance of 100- vs. 200-organism based assessments; and (c) all organisms (n = 200) will be identified to genus to evaluate the importance of family- vs. genus-level identification.
Trihalomethane Project (Dr. Jeffrey Jack, University of Louisville)
The work performed during this period included 1) continued sampling of the nine THM survey sites (large river sites and Taylorsville Lake discussed in the earlier quarter reports from the year, and 2) a series of experiments to determine the effects of algal growth on THM production. Results of these projects are described in the data results section below.
B. Difficulties encountered
No significant difficulties in the project were encountered during the quarter.
C. Data Results
Source Water Demonstration Watershed Study
Discussion of Year Two Water Sampling Results
Results from the second year’s synoptic program have given us a good look at the ambient source water quality conditions within each demonstration watershed, and we are beginning to relate water quality impairments to land use practices in each basin. Although due to last fall and winter’s severe drought that caused us to postpone the beginning of our synoptic sampling program (see the first and second quarterly reports from this year for additional information) we have obtained just ten months of data, we have decided that the analytical resources saved by this delay are best put to use in more detailed sampling over the program’s next year to understand the nature and variations in the most serious contaminants that we have identified.
A number of water quality parameters exceed the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL’s) within the untreated source water that we have examined (see Appendices C1-C3). A maximum contaminant level is the highest concentration of a contaminant that is allowed in treated drinking water by law. Legal MCL’s at the state and federal level are still under development, and have not yet been established for all compounds of concern. The relatively high levels of some contaminants that we have found in source water do not, of course, necessarily result in system violations, because of the treatment processes that the water is subject to before it is supplied to the system’s customers. However, the fundamental concept driving the Source Water Protection Initiative is that the technical and financial challenges faced by small water systems are proportional to the quality of their source water, whether it comes from ground or surface supplies and better quality source water be easier and cheaper to treat.
Impaired Source Water Concerns in the WKU SWPI Demonstration Watersheds
At this point we have identified two main sources of significant source water quality impairment: 1) pesticides, 2) microbial organisms. Each is discussed below.
Pesticides
Our sampling program has focused on 12 common pesticides used in Kentucky for a variety of applications. Although Kentucky and federal MCL’s have been established for only three of these chemicals, we have identified significant levels of nine in source water at the demonstration sites. The three pesticides for which MCL’s have been established (atrazine, alachlor, and simazine) have been found in to exceed MCL levels in the raw water of at least two water sources in our study. Levels of trifluralin, for which an MCL has not been established, exceed the Lifetime Health Advisory (LHA) Level of 0.005 mg/L in numerous samples. Three compounds (propazine, acetochlor, and linurin) were not detected in any source water sample during the program, and will no longer be investigated as part of this project. The following sections discuss the individual pesticides and their results so far during the study. n>The descriptions of the compounds draw upon information from EXTOXNET, a pesticide information source developed cooperatively by Cornell University, Oregon State University, the University of Idaho, the University of California at Davis, and Michigan State University. Interested readers should refer to the project’s web site at www.ace.orst.edu/info/extoxnet.
Atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamine-6-isopropylamino-S-triazine) is a triazine-class herbicide that is widely used in Kentucky to control broadleaf and grassy weeds in corn. It is classified as a Restricted Use Pesticide due to its potential for groundwater contamination (Ware, 1986). It has class III (slight) toxicity, but since 1994 it has been subject to a special review by EPA that may ultimately result in additional use restrictions. The MCL for Atrazine in treated drinking water (both state and federal) is 0.003 mg/L. We have had samples that exceed this level in source water at four sites (Figure 3), for a total of seven such detections during the year. While there has been significant concern about levels at the Marion water plant, where levels analyzed by Novartis Corporation have reached 0.022 mg/L, our highest detection has been at about 0.006 mg/L. This highlights the temporal variability of concentrations that depend on application schedules, antecedent moisture conditions within the catchment, rainfall amounts and patterns, and chemical mobility of the compounds, and hydrogeologic flow paths. A major focus of our current work is to unravel the complex interactions of factors that determine these temporal variations within the demonstration watersheds.
We are working with the Kentucky Department of Agriculture, Division of Pesticides, along with Novartis, to identify solutions to the lingering problems at Marion. Our highest levels have been at the Diamond Caverns site where we will be investigating land use over the next year and working with the Department of Agriculture to understand the conditions that are leading to these high levels.
Trifluralin (a,a,a-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) is a selective herbicide used to control many annual grasses and broadleaf weeds. While an MCL for drinking water has not been established either federally or in Kentucky, trifluralin was under special review between 1979 and 1982 due to concerns about the presence of N-nitrosamines. The review ended with a requirement that N-nitrosamine levels not exceed 0.5 mg/L. Although there is no legal MCL, the EPA has established a Lifetime Heath Advisory (LHA) of 0.005 mg/L for trifluralin in drinking water.
Our data (Figure 4) show that numerous source water samples have exceeded this level by two to four times during our sampling program, with one sample at Guthrie exceeding the level by an order of magnitude. This was by far the most common pesticide that we detected, and we feel that this may be a compound of some concern in the state’s groundwater supplies. With atrazine, we will be focusing our efforts over the next year to understand the relationship between land use, hydrogeology, and levels of this contaminant in drinking water sources.
Alachlor (2-chloro-2’,6’-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) actanilide) is a aniline herbicide used to control annual grasses and broadleaf weeds in corn and other crops. It us a Restricted Use Pesticide which can only be purchased and applied by certified applicators because it has been found to cause cancer in laboratory animals. Due to its moderate mobility in certain soils, it can migrate to groundwater. We found detectable levels of five of the seven watersheds (Figure 5), throughout the spring and summer months, with two samples exceeding the MCL of 0.002 mg/L (March at Auburn and April at Cadiz).
Simazine (6-chloro-N2,N4-diethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine) is a triazine herbicide that is used to control annual grasses and broad leaf weeds in turfgrass, vegetable, field and other crops. Before 1992, simazine was used as a non-selective pesticide to control algae and submerged weeds in farm ponds and swimming pools. Although simazine is a General Use, EPA toxicity class IV (practically nontoxic) compound, an MCL has been established at 0.004 mg/L has been established. Our data (Figure 6) show elevated levels at Marion and the Logsdon River research site, in one case exceeding the state and federal MCL’s by four times. We also detected simazine at four of the other demonstration sites, but in lower concentrations, below the MCL.
Metribuzin (4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methytio-1,2,4-triazin-5-one) is a triazine-class herbicide that inhibits the photosynthesis of susceptible plant species. It is used to control numerous annual grasses and broadleaf weeds in vegetable and other crops. It is a class III (slightly toxic) compound, classified as a General Use Pesticide.
While metribuzin occurs in the highest concentrations of any pesticide that we have measured in source water, the toxicity is also somewhat lower than some of the other compounds we are studying, and no samples exceeded the Lifetime Health Advisory concentration of 0.5 mg/L. We found metribuzin (Figure 7) within six of the seven demonstration sites, showing that this compound is widespread in Kentucky groundwater, if not as hazardous as some of the other pesticides in common use in the state.
Pendimethalin (N-(1-ethylpropyl)-2,6-dinitro-3,4-xylidine) is a selective herbicide used to control annual grasses and broadleaf weeds in corn and other crops. It is a class III (slightly toxic) compound, which is a classified as a General (not Restricted) Use Pesticide. We detected low concentrations (Figure 8) at four sites (Logsdon, Diamond Caverns, Caneyville, and Cadiz) but the levels do not appear to offer the same level of threat to health as the more toxic and concentrated compounds that we have identified in source water during the program.
Other pesticides detected at low levels during July 2000
An interesting pattern was noticed for the July sampling round, with elevated levels of three pesticides that had generally not been detected at other times during the year. None of these compounds, which are of lower concern for the source water demonstration watersheds we are studying, have MCL’s, although one (metolochlor) has a LHA Level of 0.1 mg/L, which is more than ten times higher than any concentrations that we recorded. These compounds are 1) metolachlor (Figure 9), 2) propachlor (Figure 10), and 3) chloraneb (Figure 11).
Microbial contaminants
Fecal coliform bacteria, for which any detection indicates the presence of human or animal waste and thus exceeds drinking water standards, was the most pervasive contaminant throughout the source waters that we sampled during the program. Over 72% of all water samples collected for the program during 2000 were contaminated with fecal bacteria (Figures Figure 12 and Figure 13). Figure 13 show the same data, with an expanded vertical scale which, while it cuts off the extreme values, shows the extent to which may samples were polluted. The presence of these bacteria, of course, signals the potential presence of other pathogenic species, making this a special concern of drinking water supplies. This especially the case for the karst areas of the state, in which rapid groundwater velocities within the conduits mean that bacteria and move into and through the aquifer systems in a short period of time, with little attenuation. This also means that bacteria levels in karst water sources can be highly variable, as especially shown by the Auburn water supply (Figure 12) in which fecal coliform levels vary by nearly four orders of magnitude, reaching a high of over 6,000 colonies/100 mL in August. It is common for karst springs to have exceedingly high levels shortly after rainstorms, when bacteria-rich human and animal waste can flushed through the soil and rapidly through the aquifer system. We will be studying the storm-scale variance of these levels during year three of the study.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Development and Land Use Analysis
We have now completed Anderson Level III landuse analysis for all seven demonstration watersheds (Figures 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, & 20). Land use was identified from 1:24,000 color infrared aerial photographs. The images consisted of nine-inch color positive film, which were viewed under magnification on a light table. Most polygons were drawn at 1:4,000, unless one particular land-use large area. This mainly occurred in the case of a continuous forest of the same type and thickness. Observing color patterns on the color infrared images using standard techniques and transposing the patterns into polygons in Environmental Systems Research Institute’s (ESRI) ArcView GIS program created parcel polygons. For example, on infrared photography analysis, reds and greens are types of vegetation and farmland; purple trees are pines or evergreens; and reddish brown trees are cedars. These color patterns and observable features on the infrared images (cultural features and livestock, for example) allowed classification of the levels (I, II, and III) of the Anderson scheme. Overall, there are 101 Level II and Level III land use categories within our study areas. Appendix C-4 depicts Anderson Level III area statistics at all the sites, including descriptions of each of the classified landuse types and the total area of each within each demonstration watershed. Using the GIS software allows us to perform statistical queries on the spatial data, and to display attribute data on any of the individual land use polygons. For example, Figure 21 shows a screen capture of such a polygon interrogation. Although we were unable to develop the software capabilities to have such queryable maps on the projects website, we will display the land use maps themselves on the internet while we develop this capability.
We have also completed quality control/quality assurance measures of our land use classification at five of the sites: Marion, Logsdon, Diamond Caverns, Guthrie, and Caneyville. Any changes in land uses between the early 1990s (when the color infrared aerial and digital orthophoto quarter quadrangle photographs were taken) and summer 2000 were incorporated into the primary GIS database. After field checking, we have determined that our land use classification is within the standard USGS Anderson 85% accuracy guideline. Additionally, we have finished development metadata for the ArcView 3.2 land use shapefiles at all the sites. The metadata is compliant with Federal Geographic Data Committee standards of FGDC-CSDGM, from version FGDC-STD-001-1998. A printout of the metadata for all seven sites is contained in Appendix C-5.
This quarter, we have begun to relate the water sampling data to potential land use threats. There are three main types of land uses that can negatively impact water quality. These are agricultural, urban, and transportation practices.
Agriculture is a primary threat to water quality. Basins with extensive coverage of row crops are likely to have pesticides and herbicides present in the area's surface and groundwater. Marion, for example, a region with lots of agricultural activities, has had multiple Atrazine violations. Agricultural lands are also especially prone to soil erosion and nutrient degradation; if not managed properly, the crops will require more chemicals to sustain outputs. Additionally, nitrate contamination can increase due to the heightened need for fertilizers. Confined feeding operations, feedlots, and poor or heavily overgrazed pasture, which are found at all seven sites, are a source of fecal bacteria.
Several specific urban threats that we have encountered include industrial plants, gas stations, and junkyards. These are dangers because of the potential for chemical spills, gas leaks, and oil trickles from old automobiles or equipment. These particular land uses can all be found in the Diamond Caverns study area. There also could be urban water quality hazards beyond surface land use, including dumping, storage tank leakage, and sewer or septic tank run-off in residential areas. Additionally, landfills can pose serious dangers to water quality from groundwater seepage; Cadiz has a landfill within its drainage basin boundary.
Along with urban threats, there are transportation land use practices that have the potential to become hazards to water quality. Many of the study areas have major roads (such as Interstate 65 in Logsdon and Diamond Caverns and Interstate 24 in the Cadiz area) that cut through the water supplies' drainage basins. These major arteries increase soil erosion, while the impervious paved surfaces allow vehicle residue to wash off onto the surrounding earth. Similarly, railroads also pose a potential threat from chemical spills. Spills are even more problematic in karst areas, since it is harder to contain contaminants that do not flow on the surface. The high velocity of groundwater at karst sites also enables the pollution to move rapidly throughout the aquifer to degrade water quality and animal life in only a few hours.
Next quarter, the remaining sites will be quality controlled and any changes will be noted in the GIS database. Additionally, we will continue to use GIS in developing protection strategies to aid in the development of best management practices.
Results of this work were disseminated during year two at a number forums concerned with GIS use and water quality. The following presentations were made:
Pfaff, R., A. Glennon, and C. Groves, 2000, Land use and Water Quality Threats to the Mammoth Cave Karst Aquifer. Presentation at the National Cave and Karst Management Symposium, Chattanooga, Tennessee (October, 1999).
Pfaff, R., A. Glennon, and C. Groves, 2000, Land use and Water Quality Threats to the Mammoth Cave Karst Aquifer. Presentation at the Kentucky GIS Conference (sponsored by the Governor’s Office for Technology), Bowling Green, Kentucky (June, 2000).
In addition, the abstract The US Environmental Protection Agency/Western Kentucky University Source Water Protection Initiative has been accepted for presentation at the upcoming annual Kentucky Academy of Science meeting in Lexington Kentucky in November.
References
Anderson, Anderson, J.R., E.E. Hardy, J.T. Roach, and R.E. Witmer, 1976, A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use With Remote Sensor Data. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 671, 28. p.
Ware, G. W., 1986, Fundamentals of Pesticides: A Self-Instruction Guide, 2nd Edition. Fresno, CA: Thomson Publications.
Habitat and Stream Macroinvertebrates as Water Quality Indicators of Rural Drinking Water Sources
Macroinvertebrate sampling has been completed for each of five sites (three karst, two non-karst). A total of eight sampling units, comprising 17 individual samples, have been obtained. Laboratory sorting (to 100 organisms), and identification (to family) has been completed for all samples. Habitat assessments are in progress, and overall stream quality (habitat plus biological) assessments are also in progress. Presented below is a working draft of an internal report ("Habitat and stream macroinvertebrates as water quality indicators of rural drinking water systems").
Report: Habitat and stream macroinvertebrates as water quality indicators of rural drinking water systems.
Assessing the health, or integrity, of aquatic systems using biological indicators (i.e., biomonitoring) has occurred commonly during this century (Cairns and Pratt, 1993). Only recently, however, have federal (EPA, Klemm et. al., 1990; USDA, Platts et al., 1983) and state (e.g., Kentucky Division of Water, Mills et al., 1993) regulatory agencies developed standardized criteria for the field collection and laboratory analysis of specific aquatic biota. Algal, fish, and macroinvertebrate communities are the three major taxonomic groups that have been commonly assessed (Plafkin et al., 1989). Aquatic macroinvertebrate communities can be collected employing a variety of qualitative and quantitative sampling methods. Although a strict quantitative approach can provide a considerably more structured base for statistical analysis, quantitative sampling techniques consequently are labor- and time-intensive, and expensive (Lenat, 1988; Shackleford, 1988). Information about the preferred applicability of a more rapid bioassessment technique was accumulating during the 1980's (e.g., Hilsenhoff, 1982). The new cost- and time-effective approach gained popularity and became embedded at the state and federal level, mainly through EPA providing technical guidance (Plafkin et al., 1989). Because of the continued popular use of rapid assessment programs, EPA has updated and expanded sampling and analysis protocols (Barbour et al., 1999).
Analyzing macroinvertebrate communities without emphasizing the importance of stream habitat may prove incomplete. The stream channel, adjacent stream banks, and riparian flora combine to form a habitat template upon which species diversity can be theoretically maximized in the absence of habitat alteration or point/non-point input(s) of a given pollutant (Vannote et al., 1980). Habitat must be examined, in concert with the macroinvertebrate community, to discern among a wide array of potentially negative stresses to the stream ecosystem.
During biomonitoring studies, macroinvertebrate communities can be assessed either according to structure, function, or both (Barbour et al., 1992). Biological integrity, as defined by EPA (1990), is the condition of the aquatic community occurring in natural habitats of unimpaired surface waters as measured by community structure and function. A biological assessment, also defined by EPA (1990), is performed to evaluate the biological condition of surface water using biological surveys and other direct measurements of resident biota. Common structural measures include taxa richness, community similarity, and pollution tolerance.
Functional measures refer to a taxon's ecological position in a guild (Terborgh and Anderson, 1986), or functional feeding group (Cummins, 1973). The macroinvertebrate functional feeding group approach is based on the link between evolutionary adaptations for food acquisition and basic nutritional categories. Food-acquiring adaptations can be morphological, behavioral, or physiological (Cummins, 1988). The macroinvertebrate functional feeding group is useful to biomonitoring studies (Cummins, 1991). Functional groups were integrated into the River Continuum Concept (RCC, Vannote et al., 1980), creating a hierarchical framework of catchment basins, river valleys, geomorphology, hydrology, and macroinvertebrates. The RCC predicts relative abundance of functional groups according to relative abundance of food categories and availability of physical habitat along a longitudinal continuum of a stream system. Alterations to the stream channel, stream bank, and/or riparian flora alters the relative abundance of food items and/or habitat available to macroinvertebrates. Hence, the functional approach is sensitive to anthropogenic changes (Cummins, 1992). For example, clearing of the riparian zone of a small forested stream without leaving a reasonably-sized buffer strip may alter the functional makeup by (a) reduction in shredder abundance because of loss of leaf litter (Wallace et al., 2000). Stream size has remained consistent but the altered habitat, as riparian flora, has changed the functional makeup of the macroinvertebrate community.
Land use practices, especially in rural areas, may compromise source water quality and present challenges to small water system operators to continually provide safe drinking water to its' consumers. This problem is further compounded because of the well-developed karst landscape of western Kentucky. Karst, as landscapes formed on soluble rock (e.g., limestone), is generally susceptible to groundwater pollution.
The overall goal of my involvement with the Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality (TACWQ), Western Kentucky University, as a participant in the Applied Research and Technology Program, is to monitor water quality through macroinvertebrate and habitat assessment. The responsibility of TACWQ is to aid rural public drinking water treatment facilities (= small water systems) to meet requirements mandated by the Safe Drinking Water Act. Five TACWQ tasks have delineated, and my duties within Task III (Source Water Protection Initiative; SWPI) are: (1) prepare a protocol for (a) field procedures for assessment of stream habitat and (b) collection and laboratory processing of macroinvertebrate samples, and (2) an assessment stream health using integrated measurements of macroinvertebrate structure and function and habitat quality.
Methods
General
During the first two fiscal years (October 1998 - September 2000) of involvement, Task III SWPI personnel have conducted synoptic and flood-pulse sampling of five karst and two non-karst sites through western Kentucky. Initial sampling was defined as "characterization", and designed to provide a complete list of federal primary and secondary drinking water standard components. Due to variability that parallels climatic factors which may influence water volume/discharge, characterization sampling was conducted during both relatively dry and relatively wet conditions. Macroinvertebrate sampling and habitat analysis have been confined to five of the seven sites, including three karst and both non-karst sites. Each of the five sites are surface water reaches, while the remaining two are wells that derive water from deep cave streams.
Macroinvertebrate sampling sites
(1) Auburn (karst) - The city of Auburn (Logan Co.) is located in the Pennyroyal Sinkhole Plain. Their water supply is derived from a large spring ("Blue Hole Spring") located 'in town', which emerges as a large pool and immediately forms a small stream. Water intake is directly from this pool. The spring drains a well-developed karst landscape that is characterized by numerous sinkholes and a near-absence of surface fluvial drainage. All water quality sampling has occurred in the pool, while macroinvertebrate sampling was conducted from the adjacent stream.
(2) Guthrie (karst) - The city of Guthrie (Todd Co.) is located in the Mississippian Plateau of the Pennyrile Region. Their water supply is derived from an integrated combination of three springs that emerge as a small pond ("Merriweather Spring"), located approximately 1 km west of Guthrie and immediately forms a small stream. Water intake is directly from this spring. The immediate landscape is characterized by moderate relief and is underlain by a well-developed karst aquifer. All water quality sampling has occurred in the pond, while macroinvertebrate sampling was conducted from the adjacent stream.
(3) Cadiz (karst) - The city of Cadiz (Trigg Co.) is also located in the Mississippian Plateau of the Pennyrile Region. Their water supply is derived from a spring that emerges as a small pool ("City Spring") located 'in town', and immediately forms a small stream. Water intake is directly from this spring. Similar to the Guthrie site, the immediate landscape is characterized by moderate relief and is underlain by a well-developed karst aquifer. All water quality sampling has occurred in the pool, while macroinvertebrate sampling was conducted from the adjacent stream.
(4) Caneyville (non-karst) - The city of Caneyville (Grayson Co.) is located in the Illinois Basin of the Western Kentucky Coalfield Region. Their water supply is derived from Caneyville Reservoir, located 4 km northeast of Caneyville. Water intake is directly from the reservoir. Numerous surface streams drain into the reservoir, but the largest is Bennett Fork of Caney Creek. All water quality sampling has occurred in the reservoir near the intake. Macroinvertebrate sampling was conducted from Bennett Fork from a riffle-run-pool reach situated immediately upstream of where surface flow dissipates due to the influence of reservoir standing water.
(5) Marion (non-karst) - The water supply for the city of Marion (Crittenden Co.) is derived from Lake George, located 4 km south of Marion. Water intake is directly from the reservoir. While numerous surface streams drain into the reservoir, most appear near-permanently dry. All water quality sampling has occurred in the reservoir near the intake. Macroinvertebrate sampling was conducted from the only outlet, an intermittent stream located immediately downstream from Lake George.
Habitat Structure: Field Measurement and Assessment (in progress)
The quality of stream habitat, including in-stream, stream bank, and general riparian features, was analyzed at two hierarchical levels. Initially, stream habitat was characterized with a sampling site survey. Second, habitat quality was assessed by following a modified set of metrics presented in Barbour et al. (1999) (in progress).
Macroinvertebrate Sampling: Field Methods (in progress)
Aquatic macroinvertebrates were sample from surface streams by employing a rapid, qualitative, multi-habitat approach. Five habitats were selected initially to enhance the total number of taxa that could be obtained, and is considered preferred to single habitat sampling (i.e., riffle only) that may underrepresent taxa richness (Lenat, 1988). The methods were designed to sample from spatially-distinct substrates (rock, sand/silt, wood/boulder, leaf pack, aquatic vascular plants). Each was sampled only if present, but neither leaf packs nor aquatic plants was sampled due to lack of availability. Sampling was conducted in spring/summer 2000 and only during low water periods as follows:
1. Traveling Kick-Net (TKN) - This technique was intended to sample macroinvertebrates that use rock substrates as habitat. A Water-Markä bottom kick net (500-mm mesh) was held firm to the stream bottom and moved 2-m upstream for 45 seconds while gently disturbing rock substrates by foot or hand. Contents of the net were wash through a 500-mm mesh sieve and preserved whole in 95% ethanol.
2. Depositional Silt and Sand (DSS) - This technique was performed to obtain macroinvertebrates from depositional areas of a stream that are dominated by small inorganic substrates such as sand, silt and occasionally, clay. These substrates are likely to be present at any site and generally support a fauna distinct from other substrates. A 250-mm mesh sieve was placed into soft substrates along the stream margin, raised slowly to the surface and washed into a 25-l bucket. This procedure was repeated two more times. The composite sample was washed back through the same sieve and all contents were preserved whole in 95% ethanol.
3. Visual Search: Wood and Boulders (VS) - This technique is intended to collect macroinvertebrates from substrate too large to effectively obtain using standard sampling equipment. Following TKN and DSS sampling, the sampling site was visually scanned for the presence of large cobbles or boulders, or coarse woody debris, either as free pieces or as part of snags. Subsequently, if present, free pieces of wood were the only large substrates present at any of the five sites. A given piece was carefully removed from the stream bottom and one end was placed in a 25-l bucket half-filled with water. All observable macroinvertebrates were hand-picked and placed in the bucket. Contents of the bucket were rinsed through a 500-mm mesh and preserved in 95% ethanol.
Macroinvertebrate Analysis: Laboratory Sorting (in progress)
In the laboratory, both TKN and VS samples were re-rinsed through a 500-mm mesh sieve while DSS samples were washed through a 250-mm mesh sieve. Following rinsing, contents were transferred to a white rectangular pan gridded into 30 equal-sized squares. Sorting proceeded under an Olympus SZH-10 Stereomicroscope at 7X in randomly-selected grids until all organisms were picked from a given grid to a total of 100 and 200 organisms. Following sorting, all organisms were stored in 75% ethanol.
Macroinvertebrate Analysis: Identification (in progress)
Macroinvertebrates were identified to two hierarchical levels. All organisms were identified initially to the family level with the exception of Oligochaeta, Copepoda, Nematoda, Hydracarina, and small Amphipoda and Pelecypoda. Second, with the exceptions as noted above, all organisms were identified to the genus level (if possible) using mainly Pennak (1989), Thorp and Covich (1991), and Merritt and Cummins (1996) (in progress). All macroinvertebrates were subsequently classified into functional feeding groups according to Merritt and Cummins (1996) and Barbour et al. (1999).
Macroinvertebrate Analysis: Community Structure and Function (in progress)
Samples taken from each habitat were treated equally. The assessment of a given sampling site was based on an integrated evaluation of both habitat and macroinvertebrates. Each sample of 100 and 200 organisms per site were used to calculate metrics. A multi-metric approach, based on 9 individual metrics, is outlined below. All metrics were calculated for each site, individually for level of identification (family, genus), number of organisms sorted (100, 200), habitat sampled (TKN, DSS, VS), and number of sampling dates (1, 2).
Structure
1. Taxa Richness - Total number of taxa.
2. EPT Richness - Total number of taxa in pollution-intolerant aquatic insect orders Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera.
3. EPT/Chironomidae Abundance Ratio - This metric measures community balance. A low ratio may indicate a disproportionate number of pollution-tolerant Chironomidae, suggesting environmental stress.
4. Cricotopus + Chironomus/Chironomidae Ratio - Both chironomid genera are generally tolerant to organic matter and toxic metal loading.
5. Percent Contribution of Dominant Taxa (PCD-5) - This metric measure faunal evenness by summing the relative percentage of the five dominant taxa.
6. Modified Biotic Index (BI) - This metric uses tolerance scores according to each taxon's tolerance to organic pollution. This scoring system was first established and subsequently modified in the United States by Hilsenhoff (1977; 1982; 1987; 1988a; 1988b). This system has been modified regionally by Lenat (1993), outlined by EPA (Plafkin et al., 1989; Barbour et al., 1999), and used to varying degrees by state regulatory agencies (e.g., KDOW, Mills et al., 1993). Both family and genus-level tolerance scoring, as well as the broader taxonomic groupings, followed Hilsenhoff (1982; 1988b), Plafkin et al. (1989), Lenat (1993) and Barbour et al. (1999).
Function
7. Filtering-Collectors/Gathering Collectors (FC/GC) - This ratio evaluates if there is an unusually high proportion of fine organic particles in suspension. A given stream is considered to be under a high degree of fine degree organic particle loading if FC/GC > 0.50.
8. Scrapers/Shredders+Total Collectors (SCR/SHR+FC+GC) - This ratio evaluates if the food source at a given site is derived mainly from in-stream primary production (autotrophic) or allochthonous organic matter (heterotrophic). A given site is considered autotrophic if SCR/SHR+FC+GC > 0.75.
9. Scrapers+Filtering-Collectors/Shredders+Gathering-Collectors (SCR+FC/SHR+GC) - This ratio evaluates substrate stability by focusing on two functional groups that require large, solid, non-shifting substrates (e.g., cobbles, coarse woody debris) as habitat. A stream has ample stable substrate if SCR+FC/SHR+GC > 0.50.
Results
Macroinvertebrate sampling has been completed for each of the five sites. A total of eight sampling units, comprising 17 individual samples, have been obtained. Laboratory sorting (to 100 organisms), and identification (to family) has been completed for all samples (Tables 1-8).
Table 1. Lotic macroinvertebrate taxa list: Auburn site, 26 February 2000.
TKN sample
DSS sample
Taxa
no.
Taxa
no.
Insect
Insect
Elmidae
1
Ceratopogonidae
1
Chironomidae
18
Chironomidae
1
Non-insect
Non-insect
Oligochaeta
14
Oligochaeta
91
Cambaridae
6
Gammaridae
2
Asellidae
3
Amphipoda (small)
1
Gammaridae
5
Pleuroceridae
6
Amphipoda (small)
4
Pleuroceridae
49
Total
100
Total
102
Table 2. Lotic macroinvertebrate taxa list: Auburn site, 15 June 2000.
TKN sample
DSS sample
Taxa
no.
Taxa
no.
Insect
Insect
Chironomidae
30
Chironomidae
29
Simuliidae
6
Non-insect
Non-insect
Oligochaeta
23
Oligochaeta
43
Gammaridae
5
Amphipoda (small)
13
Amphipoda (small)
1
Pleuroceridae
16
Hydracarina
7
Gastropoda (small)
1
Pleuroceridae
16
Sphaeriidae
1
Gastropoda (small)
18
Total
106
Total
103
Table 3. Lotic macroinvertebrate taxa list: Cadiz site, 5 March 2000.
TKN sample
DSS sample
VS sample
Taxa
no.
Taxa
no.
Taxa
no.
Insect
Insect
Insect
Ephydridae
5
Ceratopogonidae
5
Chironomidae
20
Non-insect
Non-insect
Non-insect
Planariidae
5
Oligochaeta
75
Planariidae
36
Oligochaeta
3
Oligochaeta
1
Cambaridae
2
Asellidae
84
Asellidae
93
Total
108
Total
100
Total
127
Table 4. Lotic macroinvertebrate taxa list: Guthrie site, 26 February 2000.
TKN sample
DSS sample
VS sample
Taxa
no.
Taxa
no.
Taxa
no.
Insect
Insect
Insect
Elmidae
8
Elmidae
45
Coenagrionidae
1
Chironomidae
1
Ceratopogonidae
1
Chironomidae
2
Non-insect
Non-insect
Non-insect
Planariidae
2
Planariidae
1
Planariidae
1
Oligochaeta
7
Oligochaeta
21
Asellidae
32
Asellidae
50
Asellidae
9
Gammaridae
14
Gammaridae
60
Gammaridae
20
Amphipoda (small)
1
Amphipoda (small)
9
Physidae
1
Pleuroceridae
56
Sphaeriidae
1
Physidae
8
Total
137
Total
101
Total
113
Table 5. Lotic macroinvertebrate taxa list: Guthrie site, 15 June 2000.
TKN sample
DSS sample
VS sample
Taxa
no.
Taxa
no.
Taxa
no.
Non-insect
Non-insect
Non-insect
Planariidae
2
Oligochaeta
14
Planariidae
2
Oligochaeta
8
Asellidae
26
Asellidae
71
Asellidae
75
Gammaridae
17
Crangonyctidae
2
Crangonyctidae
1
Amphipoda (small)
43
Amphipoda (small)
11
Gammaridae
7
Pleuroceridae
3
Pleuroceridae
25
Amphipoda (small)
20
Sphaeriidae
5
Physidae
7
Physidae
3
Total
116
Total
108
Total
118
Table 6. Lotic macroinvertebrate taxa list: Caneyville site, 6 April 2000.
TKN sample
DSS sample
Taxa
no.
Taxa
no.
Insect
Insect
Ameletidae
5
Siphloneuridae
8
Baetidae
1
Perlodidae
9
Heptageniidae
1
Elmidae
1
Siphloneuridae
2
Ceratopogonidae
7
Perlodidae
81
Chironomidae
23
Philopotamidae
1
Simuliidae
1
Rhyacophilidae
2
Chironomidae
1
Empididae
1
Simuliidae
3
Non-insect
Non-insect
Oligochaeta
2
Nematoda
7
Oligochaeta
33
Hydracarina
2
Total
100
Total
91a
a only 91 organisms located after 4-hr. sort.
Table 7. Lotic macroinvertebrate taxa list: Caneyville site, 16 June 2000.
DSS sample
Taxa
no.
Insect
Sialidae
1
Ceratopogonidae
1
Chironomidae
80
Non-insect
Cyclopoid Copepoda
7
Oligochaeta
12
Cambaridae
2
Asellidae
4
Crangonyctidae
2
Total
109
Table 8. Lotic macroinvertebrate taxa list: Marion site, 5 June 2000.
TKN sample
Taxa
no.
Insect
Isotomidae
1
Perlodidae
1
Dryopidae
1
Ceratopogonidae
3
Chironomidae
2
Tabanidae
3
Tipulidae
1
Non-insect
Cyclopoid Copepoda
1
Oligochaeta
29
Asellidae
39
Crangonyctidae
19
Pelecypoda (small)
2
Total
102
References
Barbour, M.T., J.L. Plafkin, B.P. Bradley, C.G. Graves, and R.W. Wisseman. 1992. Evaluation of EPA's Rapid Bioassessment Benthic Metrics: metric redundancy and variability among reference stream sites. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 11: 437-449.
Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
Cairns, J.Jr., and J.R. Pratt. 1993. A history of biological monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. Pages 10-27 In D.M. Rosenberg and V.H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York.
Cummins, K.W. 1973. Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Annual Review of Entomology 18: 183-206.
Cummins, K.W. 1988. The study of stream ecosystems: a functional view. Pages 247-262 In L.R. Pomeroy and J.J. Alberts (eds), Concepts of Ecosystem Ecology: A Comparative View. Ecological Studies 67. Springer-Verlag Incorporated, New York, New York.
Cummins, K.W. 1991. Establishing biological criteria: functional views of biotic community organization. Pages 3-8 In Biological Criteria: Research and Regulation, Proceedings of a Symposium. EPA-440/5-91-005. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
Cummins, K.W. 1992. Invertebrates. Pages 234-250 In P. Calow and G.E. Petts (eds), The Rivers Handbook: Hydrological and Ecological Perspectives. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, London, United Kingdom.
Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1977. Use of arthropods to evaluate water quality in streams. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Technical Bulletin No. 100.
Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1982. Using a biotic index to evaluate water quality in streams. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Technical Bulletin No. 132.
Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1987. An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution. Great Lakes Entomologist 20: 31-39.
Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1988a. Seasonal correction factors for the biotic index. Great Lakes Entomologist 21: 9-13.
Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1988b. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 65-68.
Klemm, D.J., P.A. Lewis, F. Fulk, and J.M. Lazorchak. 1990. Macroinvertebrate Field and Laboratory Methods for Evaluating the Biological Integrity of Surface Waters. EPA/600/4-90/030. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
Lenat, D.R. 1988. Water quality assessment of streams using a qualitative collection method for benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 222-233.
Lenat, D.R. 1993. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 279-290.
Merritt, R.W. and K.W. Cummins (eds). 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. 3rd ed. Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa. 862pp.
Mills, M.R., G. Beck, J. Brumley, S.M. Call, J. Grubbs, R. Houp, L. Metzmeier, and K. Smathers. 1993. Methods of Assessing Biological Integrity of Surface Waters. Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water, Water Quality Branch, Ecological Support Section, Frankfort, Kentucky. 139pp.
Pennak, R.W. 1989. Fresh-Water Invertebrates of the United States. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York. 628pp.
Plafkin, J.L., M.T. Barbour, K.D. Porter, S.K. Gross, and R.M. Hughes. 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. EPA/444/4-89-001. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
Platts, W.S., W.F. Megahan, and G.W. Minshall. 1983. Methods for Evaluating Stream, Riparian, and Biotic Conditions. General Technical Report INT-138. United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service, Ogden, Utah.
Shackleford, R. 1988. Rapid Bioassessments of Lotic Macroinvertebrate Communities: Biocriteria Development. Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology. Little Rock, Arkansas.
Terborgh, J. and S. Anderson. 1986. Guilds and their utility in ecology. Pages 65-90 In J. Kikkawa and D.R. Anderson (eds), Community Ecology: Pattern and Process. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Thorp, J.H. and A.P. Covich (eds.). 1991. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, San Diego, California. 911pp.
U.S. E.P.A. 1990. Biological Criteria: National Program Guidance for Surface Waters. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. EPA-440/5-90-004. Washington, D.C.
Vannote, R.L., G.W. Minshall, K.W. Cummins, J.R. Sedell, and C.E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130-137.
Wallace, J.B., S.L. Eggert, J.L. Meyer, and J.R. Webster. 2000. Effects of resource limitation on a detritus-based ecosystem. Ecological Monographs (in press).
Trihalomethane (THM) Study
Algal Growth and THM production
The effects of algal growth on THM production were investigated in three experiments during the summer of 2000. Raw Ohio River water was incubated in 2000L mesocosms with different light and nutrient levels for 6 days. Algal biomass (as chlorophyll a), algal growth rates (as exponential daily growth) and turbidity were measured at three times through the experiments (days 0, 3, and 6). Tank covers provided surface shading at two levels (88% and 95%) approximating average water column levels in shallow, upstream river stretches and deeper, downstream stretches, respectively. Nutrient levels were manipulated by keeping ambient concentrations or adding dissolved inorganic nutrients (N, P, and Si) to double the ambient concentrations. Rates of bacterioplankton production were estimated by measuring the incorporation of tritiated thymidine into bacterial DNA. If bacterioplankton are in balanced growth, the rates of incorporation into the different macromolecular fractions (RNA, DNA, protein) will give equivalent estimates of growth rate. In addition, in the second experiment the density of zooplankton grazers was manipulated in some mesocosms as a pilot study to assess the effect of suspension feeders on algal biomass and thus indirectly on THM formation. It was hypothesized that higher light and nutrient availability and would positively affect algal growth rates and biomass accumulation over the six-day experiments. We proposed that increases in algal biomass would be directly related to THM formation potential (THMFP). We also hypothesized that grazing would reduce algal biomass and consequently THM production. Only data from the first two experiments have been analyzed.
The initial light availability differed between the two experiments, as the suspended sediment load of the raw river water was significantly higher in the latter experiment. The average initial turbidity of Experiment 1 was approximately16 ntu compared with 50 ntu in Experiment 2 (Figure 22). Although each tank had three power heads to provide water mixing, tank turbidities declined throughout the six days in both experiments. The average final turbidity was 7 ntu in Experiment 1 and 23 ntu in Experiment 2. Although the turbidities were very different between experiments, the rates of turbidity loss were similar (-0.14 ntu d-1 and –0.13 ntu d-1, Exp. 1 and Exp. 2, respectively.) These turbidity differences translated into differences light availability in the tanks. The average light attenuation rate in Experiment 1 was 1.0 m-1 compared to 2.0 m-1 in Experiment 2. This difference represents a halving of the water-column light availability in Experiment 2 that is in addition to experimental light treatments. Consequently, the quantity of light available to the phytoplankton (with respect to light treatment) was significantly greater in Experiment 1.
Light availability positively affected algal biomass accumulation. Biomass accumulation over the six days in Experiment 1 was greater than Experiment 2 (cf. Figure 23a and 23b) and is consistent with the between-experiment light availability (discussed above). Initial (Day 0) chlorophyll levels were similar between light treatments in both experiments, and positive algal biomass accrual was seen in both high and low light treatments over the six-days in both experiments. However, differences in light treatment effects were seen in both Day 3 and Day 6 samples (Figures 23a and 23b). Daily biomass accumulation was greatest in Experiment 1 in the high light treatment (Figure 23a). In contrast, algal biomass in the low light treatment showed little change between Day 3 and Day 6. Overall biomass accumulation was lower in Experiment 2; however, differences between light treatments are still evident (Figure 23b).
The effect of nutrient additions on algal biomass and growth rates was equivocal. Because of the differences in light availability between Experiment 1 and 2, nutrient effects were analyzed in terms of algal growth rates. Experiment 1 nutrient additions were associated with higher algal growth rates in high light treatments; however, growth rates did not differ in low light treatments (Figure 24). In contrast, growth rates in Experiment 2 low light treatments in showed a positive correlation with nutrient addition, while high light growth rates were negatively correlated with nutrient additions (Figure 24). Overall, there was no clear nutrient effect on algal growth rates.
Replicates were performed for individual light treatment effects upon bacterial growth rates (Figures 25a and 25b) Within tank replicates showed great variability that could not be explained. Examination of these results showed no statistical correlation between light treatments and bacterial growth that were consistent.
THMFPs were run and compared to ecosystem parameters in the experiments. In the first two experiments, there was not been a strong relationship between TTHM and chlorophyll a (e.g. Figure 26 from Experiment 2). This was somewhat unexpected because some earlier work in reservoirs has linked algal community biomass and to some extent composition with TTHM production. We are presently analyzing this data set to assess if there are consistent trends between THM production under these varying treatment conditions and other community-level measures such as DOC, ash free dry mass or algal community composition. There were differences between the mesocosm treatments and the Ohio River, with the Ohio acting as a sink for THM and the mesocosm communities acting as sources for THM over the course of the 10 day trials (e.g. Figure 27 from Experiment 2).
The grazing treatment had no significant effect on THM production (Figure 28). As this was a pilot study for next year, we did not have a full factorial experimental design but it does indicate that pelagic suspension feeders such as the zooplankton may not be important contributors to THM formation. Next year, we intend to use a more balanced experimental design and include other suspension feeders from the Ohio River, such as zebra mussels, whose filtering activities may impact THMFP.
Possible interpretations of the first two experiments
a) TTHM production is affected more by algal community structure than by total biomass as estimated by chlorophyll a. We have the samples we need to address this possibility, but we have no data on this yet. Alternatively, other community level parameters such as DOC/POC may be important. These are currently being assessed.
b) TTHM production is driven more by allochthonous (terrestrial carbon) than autochthonous carbon (algae in the river). We will be using the mesocosm system next spring and summer to address this issue. If this is the case, than THM dynamics in the river are controlled by processes different than what we initially hypothesized.
c) Algal communities that are actively growing in the river are more effective in producing THM than senescing communities. This would be consistent with some published data from reservoirs. We will be addressing this possibly with small-scale incubation experiments.
Large River Survey
We completed another round of the large river survey this past August. We sampled eight sites in the Ohio River and its major tributaries and we sampled for THMFP and the associated parameters as described in previous reports. Once again, the Wabash River has the highest THMFPs, more than double the lowest site (the midriver Ohio River site; see Figure 29). We are planning a December sampling to try to assess THMFP during high pool/cool temperature period in the Ohio River and its tributaries. Because of the consistent differences we are seeing between the Ohio and its main tributaries in THMFP, we are now planning to conduct a more intensive series of surveys next year in the basin. This may include month sampling with special attention paid to the Wabash River as a major source of THMFP to the Lower Ohio River.
Taylorsville Lake Study
We are nearing completion of the first year of sampling at Taylorsville Lake. We have run a series of splits to assess the performance of our contract lab and we are awaiting further analysis of the results of these QA/QC runs. We should have at least preliminary data for the input/output model by the end of this year, depending on the outcome of our QA/QC program.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for this task from 07/01/99 to 09/30/00 were $14,364. The year-to-date Task 3 expenditures have been $70,259 out of a second year budget of $135,355.
Task 3 fourth quarter expenditures and encumbrances combined were $21,243, comprising 15.7% of the year’s budget. For the year, Task 3's combined materials, analytical, and personnel costs has expended or encumbered 90.4% ($122,353) of the $135,355 year 2 budget. The remaining funds reflect the delayed sampling schedule due to the drought of last fall and winter. These funds will allow us to perform more detailed sampling for compounds of concern during the upcoming year than next year’s reduced task budget would have otherwise allowed. Additionally, $60,638 (44.8%) of the total budget has been spent and encumbered for the Trihalomethanes study emphasis under Dr. Jeffrey Jack at the University of Louisville.
Trihalomethane Study Expenditures ($60,638.03 subcontract):
a) Compared to our milestones we are on schedule for the river survey and mesocosm studies. Were are still one month behind for the Taylorsville study because of the loss of the December data. We have expended the entire budget for the first year.
b) No discrepancies to report
III. Changes in Key Personnel
There were no changes in key personnel during the fourth quarter.
Task 4: Database Management and Information Tools
I. Work Status
It is the responsibility of Task 4, Database Management and Information Tools, to provide appropriate methods and structures for reporting data and metadata to meet the needs of: (1) facilitating efficient and convenient reporting of information by all other Tasks, (2) appropriate capture and storage of data and metadata by the Database Management System, and (3) accessible retrieval of information and materials by end users along with ancillary information required for interpretation. The Information Tools function of our Task works to put technology, information, and the tools to create information capacity and capability directly into the hands of water providers, and to make that technology and information as accessible as possible.
A. Work progress. Efforts by Task 4 this quarter continued to focus in five areas: (1) ongoing website development as a tool for providing information to water systems; (2) development of software and information tools for the direct use of water providers themselves; (3) expanding our information services to those states in EPA Region 4 beyond Kentucky; (4) ongoing construction and maintenance of the project database; and (5) reconstruction and refurbishing of donated, retired computers for use by water systems in need.
1) Ongoing website development and communication. We have completely renovated our website in order to simplify navigation and make every section of the site more accessible. We have also obtained a simpler internet address at http://water.wku.edu. This reorganization was essential in order to efficiently deliver the rapidly growing sources of new information, software, maps, tools, documents, and links that we are developing and collecting. Figures 30, 31, 32, & 33 show a few of the pages from our revamped website.
2) Development of software and information tools for direct use. During the fourth quarter, we completed development of a Water Loss spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel format (Figure 34). This spreadsheet should facilitate recognition and evaluation of problem leaks, and provide an assessment of the percentage loss and gallons of loss per day and per minute experienced by a water system. This software is available for download from our website, and is also available at our internet site as a form that can be filled out and calculated online, then printed out by the water system.
In-house development of a piece of software, MOR Advisor, to facilitate the completion and filing of Monthly Operating Reports by small water systems, was completed, tested, debugged, finalized, and made available for free download from our website this year. During this fourth quarter, a new installation program was written (Figure 35) which installs MOR Advisor, the Java runtime utility it requires, and some additional information tools we developed in cooperation with KRWA that are available at our website. A copy of a distributable Compact Disc accompanies this report which includes the installation program, MOR Advisor, the Water Loss spreadsheet, and additional tools including drinking water quality maps and Consumer Confidence Report templates.
The program MOR Advisor was constructed by Mr. Seth Johnson, a WKU student, in the Java programming language for lean programming and a good graphical user interface. The Java runtime utility required by the program is available for free, as is our software. We are therefore able to efficiently provide a completely free package that does not require either pre-existing software or a particular operating system. Much additional effort has been expended to make the program function well even on machines with limited computing power. The program has been optimized to run under both Windows and Linux operating environments.
3) Data gathering and information services to Kentucky and other states. It is part of our mission in this second year of EPA funding to begin expanding our technical assistance services to the rest of the southeastern U.S. A primary goal of the mapping effort presented here is to identify large-scale patterns in water quality problems for the southeastern U.S. so that the solutions to these problems may be efficiently targeted.
4) Development of project database. Microsoft SQL Server is being used to house and query the databases we have begun to accumulate. Metadata is being constructed for the GIS maps we are producing. We have made additional progress toward a final definition of the project's database structure. We very recently received part of the critical information needed from Task 3 and look forward to completing the database structure that will house their information. Selected data from the EPA SDWIS database have been acquired and queried in conjunction with our efforts to clarify and resolve patterns of water quality problems experienced by small water systems.
5) Rehabilitation of retired computers for use by water systems. While we originally proposed to investigate the possibility of renovating computers for water systems this year, we did in fact execute such a renovation this year. From a collection of 25 available machines, we have completed the preparation and refurbishing of nine old computers donated for long-term loan to water systems in need of computing power. This effort came to completion after a very long series of technical problems and solutions. Students who participated in this work are to be commended for their effort and persistence. All computers and associated equipment (monitors, mice, keyboards, modems) were submitted to a final check and cleaning. A detailed Operator's Manual was written and produced as an accompaniment to these machines (included last quarter as Appendix D-1). The machines were delivered to KRWA for distribution early this quarter. A Press Release was made at that time as well. Feedback request forms were included with the Operator's Manual to help evaluate needs and utilities for donated computers the TACWQ might distribute in future.
B. Difficulties encountered.
No insurmountable difficulties have been encountered.
C. Preliminary data results.
In previous quarters we have presented a large number of maps and results from plotting and evaluating drinking water Maximum Contaminant Level violations. These included information for the southeastern U.S. (EPA Region 4) for 1996, 1997, and 1998. We have also downloaded and plotted EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for Region 4 and some adjoining states (Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland). However, we have not been able to gain assurances from the SDWIS authorities that the available data is complete through the end of the year 1999. We therefore, present only one summary map of 1999 data for the southeastern U.S. as a whole (Figure 36). Taken at face value, the lowered number of dots would suggest that many states in the southeastern U.S. have shown sharp decreases in the number of MCL violations for the year 1999, where in fact it appears that the data is incomplete. These data have been plotted for each individual state within the region shown, but it is felt that we must have confirmation of the quality of the data before these maps are released, or replotted and released.
D. Anticipated activities.
We will further publicize the availability of the free MOR Advisor and ancillary software and information tools for distribution by CD or website download during the next quarter, and will begin to gather feedback on its use and work on developing versions for use in other states. Work will continue in our data gathering and information harvesting, with GIS as a primary mode of analysis and display of information. Ongoing development and maintenance of the structure and content of the project database will also continue. We shall also continue to respond to requests by water systems and the public for data and information on an ongoing basis. Slide presentations developed for local instruction and for presentation at national scientific conferences (Attachment) will also be made available on the website.
II. Discussion of Expenditures
Expenditures for this task from 07/01/99 to 09/30/00 were $20,910. The year-to-date Task 4 expenditures have been $75,304 out of a second year budget of $99,401. We have delayed some equipment purchases this year in order to be certain we have adequate materials and supplies for next year, and to make sure that our equipment purchases exactly meet our needs.
III. Key Personnel Changes<
There have been no changes in key personnel within Task 4 during this quarter. Dr. Ouida Meier continues to direct the efforts of Task 4. We are very fortunate in having had a team of bright, talented undergraduate students who assisted with the work in Task 4 very creatively and capably this year: Mr. Seth M. Johnson, Computer Programmer, who has developed the MOR Advisor software and User's Guide, contributed significantly to the preparation and final check of the loaner computers, and harvested data from the EPA SDWIS database; Mr. Jake Lyon, Linux Specialist, who was responsible for a final check of the loaner computers, authored the loaner computer Operator's Manual, and was primarily responsible for executing the website renovation; Mr. Shane Fryer, GIS Specialist, who plotted the maps that appear in this report and developed new modes of information layout; and Ms. Kim Gaines, Research Assistant, who located information on source water quality to extend our analyses. The Center is very grateful for their dedicated and skillful efforts.
Task 5: Innovative Technologies
I. Work Status:
The objective of Task 5 initially was to encourage pilot projects that demonstrate the benefits and effectiveness of innovative and emerging technologies in the drinking water industry. It has since developed into other areas. These are:
Western Kentucky University Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality (TACWQ) has set an objective to become a Field Testing Organization (FTO) for NSF & EPA.
To develop a Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide and Form for Ground Water and Surface Water supplies.
Conduct a water rate study, at the request of the city of Russellville, Kentucky, to determine the cost of servicing three water districts.
A. Work Progress
Pilot Studies. No pilots were visited during this quarter. Spatial Data Integrations, working with KRWA and TACWQ has completed the demonstration pilot with the Lake Village Water District. This was a successful demonstration.
FTO Certification. Little progress was made toward this goal because of a lack of funding. One community is interested in piloting UV technology if funding becomes available.
Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide. The Sanitary Survey Self-Assessment Field Guide and corresponding Form is essentially complete and on TACWQ’s Web Page for review and comment from interested parties. The document will be complete during the first quarter of the third year. The Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide for Surface Water is approximately 60% complete and will be completed as time permits. It is scheduled for completion by the end of the third year.
Russellville Kentucky Water Rate Study: The City of Russellville requested assistance in conducting a study to determine the cost of serving three water districts. This study is complete.
B. Difficulties Encountered
No difficulties were encountered.
C. Preliminary Data Results
The Spatial Data Integrations pilot at Lake Village Water District is complete, with satisfactory results.
D. Anticipated Activities
TACWQ will continue to review and report on innovative technology.
TACWQ plans to pursue it efforts to become a FTO. We hope to discuss these plans with NSF during the third year.
The Sanitary Survey Self Assessment Field Guide and Form for Surface Water Supplies will be completed during the first quarter of the third year.
TACWQ with its partner, Kentucky Rural Water Association, will continue to sponsor a two or three day seminar with the Kentucky–Tennessee Section of the American Water Association. The Kentucky Division of Water, the Tennessee Division of Water Quality and USEPA will be asked to present an update of the regulations and rules governing drinking water quality, while others will present information on technical, managerial, and financial capacity. Feedback from those in attendance at the first meeting indicated that this was a very successful meeting, not only because of the content but also because of the location.
II. Discussion of Expenditures:
Expenditures for this task from 07/01/99 to 09/30/00 were $1,003. The year-to-date Task 5 expenditures have been $6,745 out of a second year budget of $9,081.
III. Key Personnel Changes:
There were no personnel changes during this period.
Task 5, Innovative Technologies: Attachment
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
LAKE VILLAGE WATER ASSOCIATION, BURGIN, KENTUCKY
JULY, 1999 - JUNE, 2000
FINAL REPORT
In June, 1999 the Technical Assistance Center for Water Quality (TACWQ) at Western Kentucky University, the Kentucky Rural Water Association (KRWA), and Spatial Data Integrations, Inc. (SDI) announced the establishment of an Innovative Technology Demonstration Project to illustrate the advantages of using a GIS (Geographic Information System) for facilities management at small water utilities. Lake Village Water Association (LVWA) of Burgin, Kentucky was chosen as the site for the project which ran from July 1999 through June 2000. LVWA , which has 1750 customers and more than 83 miles of mains, is headed by Mike Royalty who was the principal tester for the project.
In July, 1999 SDI provided LVWA with base maps for its service area. These maps included seamless digital topographic maps prepared from USGS DRGs (Digital Raster Graphics), digital aerial photography produced from USGS DOQQs (Digital Orthophotograhic Quarter Quadrangles) and an elevation grid produced from USGS DEMs (Digital Elevation Models). SDI also provided LVWA with WaterWorks/FM™ -- a GIS system developed by SDI, to enable small and medium-sized utilities to digitize and display mains, valves, hydrants, service lines, meters and other facilities information on a digital map. Once this system information is "drawn" and keyed into the program, the software enables the utility to analyze its system data to assist with facilities management, customer service, long-range planning and other operational issues.
Screen shot from WaterWorks/FM™ showing mains, hydrants, valves, service lines, meters, and other features digitized on top of digital aerial photography as the base map.
In August, 1999 Mike Royalty began "drawing" his mains into the software using the aerial photography as his point of reference. As mains were added, the lines were automatically snapped together by the software to ensure connectivity. Then point features were added including fittings, valves, and hydrants among others. Service lines were added to connect meters to the mains. As each service line was drawn on the map, the software automatically snapped the service to the main and added a saddle at the main and a meter at the other end of the line. As Mr. Royalty had free moments, he worked on entering more data into the system. By early 2000 he was ready to begin adding information into the system to describe the attributes of the features that he had drawn on the map. By the end of June, 2000 LVWA has completed digitizing all of its mains, meters, valves, hydrants, and other features and was well into the task of coding the information about these features.
Screen shot from WaterWorks/FM™ showing form used to code the attributes for Mains. Drop down lists contain elections to pick with the mouse simplifying data entry. Forms are provided for each feature type.
Throughout the year, Mike Royalty has freely shared his time and information with other utility managers who have been interested in GIS. He has participated in a number of meetings in which he has discussed the demonstration project and how GIS is being utilized in his system. In June 2000 he was on the program at the KYGIS conference in Bowling Green to talk about his experience with the demonstration project. He is now a strong advocate for utility operators to use GIS in the management of their operations. Among the anecdotes which Mr. Royalty shared at the conference were these:
A resident showed up at board meeting and wanted to know what it would cost to get water hooked up to his property. Using the GIS software, Mike was able to locate the resident's property on the map, use a measuring tool in the software to calculate the distance from the closest main to the man's property, and provide an estimate on the spot. Prior to having the GIS software, Mike would have had to go out to the property, use a wheel to calculate the distance, and then prepare a quote for the resident--a process that normally took at least a week.
Using a Leak Tracker component that comes with WaterWorks/FM, Mike was able to determine that several leaks had occurred along the same 10-mile section of pipe and was able to recommend to his board that the whole section be replaced to avoid further service interruptions and water losses.
LVWA is in the process of completing the entry of existing features into its GIS system. A key advantage that LVWA has found in using GIS is that its system map need never be out of date. As new water mains and service lines are put in the ground they can be added to the digital mapping system. As repairs take place on older mains in the system where size and material were unknown, this data can be recorded in the GIS. Having all of the system information in one place is a real convenience for LVWA.